Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomen...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism? / Hoy, J A ; Hatton, C ; Hare, D .
In: Autism, Vol. 8, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 267-281.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hoy JA, Hatton C, Hare D. Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism? Autism. 2004 Sept;8(3):267-281. doi: 10.1177/1362361304045218

Author

Hoy, J A ; Hatton, C ; Hare, D . / Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism?. In: Autism. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 267-281.

Bibtex

@article{c6f869e69c4c40a58f4183ee7306231f,
title = "Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism?",
abstract = "This study investigated whether evidence for the weak central coherence theory could be specifically associated with a group of children with autism compared with normally developing children (n = 17 per group). Two tasks were employed, one involving visual illusions and the other verbal homophones. Both were based on tasks used in previous central coherence research. Incorporation of tasks involving the use of different domains (verbal versus visual) also enabled the investigation of claims that weak central coherence is a cross-domain processing style or deficit. The autistic group were found to be no different to the control group in performance on the visual illusions task. The autistic group made more errors than the normally developing group on the rare condition of the homophone task. However, analysis suggests this difference is mediated by verbal ability level and not diagnostic status per se. Theoretical implications and alternative explanations are discussed.",
keywords = "Asperger syndrome, autism, central coherence theory, INDIVIDUALS, PERFORMANCE, ILLUSIONS",
author = "Hoy, {J A} and C Hatton and D Hare",
year = "2004",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1177/1362361304045218",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "267--281",
journal = "Autism",
issn = "1461-7005",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weak central coherence: a cross-domain phenomenon specific to autism?

AU - Hoy, J A

AU - Hatton, C

AU - Hare, D

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - This study investigated whether evidence for the weak central coherence theory could be specifically associated with a group of children with autism compared with normally developing children (n = 17 per group). Two tasks were employed, one involving visual illusions and the other verbal homophones. Both were based on tasks used in previous central coherence research. Incorporation of tasks involving the use of different domains (verbal versus visual) also enabled the investigation of claims that weak central coherence is a cross-domain processing style or deficit. The autistic group were found to be no different to the control group in performance on the visual illusions task. The autistic group made more errors than the normally developing group on the rare condition of the homophone task. However, analysis suggests this difference is mediated by verbal ability level and not diagnostic status per se. Theoretical implications and alternative explanations are discussed.

AB - This study investigated whether evidence for the weak central coherence theory could be specifically associated with a group of children with autism compared with normally developing children (n = 17 per group). Two tasks were employed, one involving visual illusions and the other verbal homophones. Both were based on tasks used in previous central coherence research. Incorporation of tasks involving the use of different domains (verbal versus visual) also enabled the investigation of claims that weak central coherence is a cross-domain processing style or deficit. The autistic group were found to be no different to the control group in performance on the visual illusions task. The autistic group made more errors than the normally developing group on the rare condition of the homophone task. However, analysis suggests this difference is mediated by verbal ability level and not diagnostic status per se. Theoretical implications and alternative explanations are discussed.

KW - Asperger syndrome

KW - autism

KW - central coherence theory

KW - INDIVIDUALS

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - ILLUSIONS

U2 - 10.1177/1362361304045218

DO - 10.1177/1362361304045218

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 267

EP - 281

JO - Autism

JF - Autism

SN - 1461-7005

IS - 3

ER -