Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic He...
View graph of relations

What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules?

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules? / Ball, Linden J.; Alford, D.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. ed. / D. McNamara; G. Trafton. New Jersey: Sheridan Printing, 2007.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Ball, LJ & Alford, D 2007, What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules? in D McNamara & G Trafton (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Sheridan Printing, New Jersey.

APA

Ball, L. J., & Alford, D. (2007). What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules? In D. McNamara, & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Sheridan Printing.

Vancouver

Ball LJ, Alford D. What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules? In McNamara D, Trafton G, editors, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New Jersey: Sheridan Printing. 2007

Author

Ball, Linden J. ; Alford, D. / What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules?. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. editor / D. McNamara ; G. Trafton. New Jersey : Sheridan Printing, 2007.

Bibtex

@inbook{391c225d40c04e44ba51762cbdfc14fa,
title = "What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules?",
abstract = "On what basis do people provide acceptability or {\textquoteleft}goodness{\textquoteright} judgements for deontic conditional rules of the form if p then must q and if p then may q? Using a decision theoretic analysis, Over et al. (2004) propose that such conditionals are judged as acceptable to the extent that the p&q possibility is preferred to the p&not-q possibility. Their empirical evidence upholds this {\textquoteleft}conditional expected utility{\textquoteright} (CEU) prediction for conditional obligations and permissions relating to everyday activities (e.g., If you wash the dishes then you must wear rubber gloves). We report two experiments examining Over at al.{\textquoteright}s CEU hypothesis in relation to real-world deontic rules concerning everyday health and safety issues (e.g., If you are in a moving car then you must have your safety-belt fastened). We propose that Over et al.{\textquoteright}s CEU hypothesis provides a compelling account of our findings.",
keywords = "Deontic reasoning, permission and obligation rules, health and safety, conditional expected utility.",
author = "Ball, {Linden J.} and D. Alford",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
editor = "D. McNamara and G. Trafton",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society",
publisher = "Sheridan Printing",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - What Determines the Acceptability of Deontic Health and Safety Rules?

AU - Ball, Linden J.

AU - Alford, D.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - On what basis do people provide acceptability or ‘goodness’ judgements for deontic conditional rules of the form if p then must q and if p then may q? Using a decision theoretic analysis, Over et al. (2004) propose that such conditionals are judged as acceptable to the extent that the p&q possibility is preferred to the p&not-q possibility. Their empirical evidence upholds this ‘conditional expected utility’ (CEU) prediction for conditional obligations and permissions relating to everyday activities (e.g., If you wash the dishes then you must wear rubber gloves). We report two experiments examining Over at al.’s CEU hypothesis in relation to real-world deontic rules concerning everyday health and safety issues (e.g., If you are in a moving car then you must have your safety-belt fastened). We propose that Over et al.’s CEU hypothesis provides a compelling account of our findings.

AB - On what basis do people provide acceptability or ‘goodness’ judgements for deontic conditional rules of the form if p then must q and if p then may q? Using a decision theoretic analysis, Over et al. (2004) propose that such conditionals are judged as acceptable to the extent that the p&q possibility is preferred to the p&not-q possibility. Their empirical evidence upholds this ‘conditional expected utility’ (CEU) prediction for conditional obligations and permissions relating to everyday activities (e.g., If you wash the dishes then you must wear rubber gloves). We report two experiments examining Over at al.’s CEU hypothesis in relation to real-world deontic rules concerning everyday health and safety issues (e.g., If you are in a moving car then you must have your safety-belt fastened). We propose that Over et al.’s CEU hypothesis provides a compelling account of our findings.

KW - Deontic reasoning

KW - permission and obligation rules

KW - health and safety

KW - conditional expected utility.

M3 - Chapter

BT - Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

A2 - McNamara, D.

A2 - Trafton, G.

PB - Sheridan Printing

CY - New Jersey

ER -