Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What Do Platform Workers Think About the Law?

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What Do Platform Workers Think About the Law?: The Ambiguous Legal Status and Legal Consciousness of On-Demand Food Delivery Riders in China

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

What Do Platform Workers Think About the Law? The Ambiguous Legal Status and Legal Consciousness of On-Demand Food Delivery Riders in China. / Lin, Ou.
In: Industrial Law Journal, 31.07.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{86109b3d75ff42499ee58b248df5a04d,
title = "What Do Platform Workers Think About the Law?: The Ambiguous Legal Status and Legal Consciousness of On-Demand Food Delivery Riders in China",
abstract = "Chinese law has not yet clearly addressed the employment status of platform workers, whose work is allocated to individuals in a specific geographical area via location-based apps. This study investigates how the workers themselves, as the key constituent group, understand their legal status. Drawing on interviews with food delivery riders and participant observation, it applies legal consciousness theory to explore how riders interpret, construct, and invoke law in a largely unregulated area. The findings reveal that riders, despite holding contradictory perceptions of their work arrangements and legal status, more often rely on informal expressions of dissatisfaction or anger and acts of {\textquoteleft}everyday resistance{\textquoteright} than formal claims or collective action. The study shows that riders{\textquoteright} legal consciousness is shaped by their{\textquoteright} ambiguous legal status and socioeconomic position and is grounded more in rules than in rights. Moreover, current legal responses reinforce existing social inequalities, leaving riders in a precarious position with limited recourse.",
author = "Ou Lin",
year = "2025",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1093/indlaw/dwaf025",
language = "English",
journal = "Industrial Law Journal",
issn = "0305-9332",
publisher = "Oxford University Press Inc",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Do Platform Workers Think About the Law?

T2 - The Ambiguous Legal Status and Legal Consciousness of On-Demand Food Delivery Riders in China

AU - Lin, Ou

PY - 2025/7/31

Y1 - 2025/7/31

N2 - Chinese law has not yet clearly addressed the employment status of platform workers, whose work is allocated to individuals in a specific geographical area via location-based apps. This study investigates how the workers themselves, as the key constituent group, understand their legal status. Drawing on interviews with food delivery riders and participant observation, it applies legal consciousness theory to explore how riders interpret, construct, and invoke law in a largely unregulated area. The findings reveal that riders, despite holding contradictory perceptions of their work arrangements and legal status, more often rely on informal expressions of dissatisfaction or anger and acts of ‘everyday resistance’ than formal claims or collective action. The study shows that riders’ legal consciousness is shaped by their’ ambiguous legal status and socioeconomic position and is grounded more in rules than in rights. Moreover, current legal responses reinforce existing social inequalities, leaving riders in a precarious position with limited recourse.

AB - Chinese law has not yet clearly addressed the employment status of platform workers, whose work is allocated to individuals in a specific geographical area via location-based apps. This study investigates how the workers themselves, as the key constituent group, understand their legal status. Drawing on interviews with food delivery riders and participant observation, it applies legal consciousness theory to explore how riders interpret, construct, and invoke law in a largely unregulated area. The findings reveal that riders, despite holding contradictory perceptions of their work arrangements and legal status, more often rely on informal expressions of dissatisfaction or anger and acts of ‘everyday resistance’ than formal claims or collective action. The study shows that riders’ legal consciousness is shaped by their’ ambiguous legal status and socioeconomic position and is grounded more in rules than in rights. Moreover, current legal responses reinforce existing social inequalities, leaving riders in a precarious position with limited recourse.

U2 - 10.1093/indlaw/dwaf025

DO - 10.1093/indlaw/dwaf025

M3 - Journal article

JO - Industrial Law Journal

JF - Industrial Law Journal

SN - 0305-9332

ER -