Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What factors are associated with children being...

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services?: A survival analysis of Children’s Social Care data in Liverpool

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services? A survival analysis of Children’s Social Care data in Liverpool. / McHale, Philip; Filipe, Luís; Hodgson, Sarah et al.
In: BMJ Public Health, Vol. 2, No. 2, e001130, 07.10.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McHale P, Filipe L, Hodgson S, Bennett D, Barr B. What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services? A survival analysis of Children’s Social Care data in Liverpool. BMJ Public Health. 2024 Oct 7;2(2):e001130. Epub 2024 Oct 7. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001130

Author

Bibtex

@article{6bbac4342eb742f89fc110b3a337cf0c,
title = "What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services?: A survival analysis of Children{\textquoteright}s Social Care data in Liverpool",
abstract = "Background: Increasing numbers of children in the UK are being taken into care, with adverse consequences for children and unsustainable costs for local government. It is crucial that local authorities better understand which children are most at risk to target preventative interventions. Objectives: To identify predictors of children becoming {\textquoteleft}looked after{\textquoteright} (taken into care by the state) among children known to a local authority. Methods: Secondary analysis of routinely collected Children{\textquoteright}s Social Care data including all children who first became known to social care in Liverpool between April 2019 and March 2022, (excluding unaccompanied asylum seeker children). Outcome was time (in months) between first contact with social care and either becoming looked after or reaching the censoring date (March 2022). Survival analysis was undertaken using a discrete time hazard model. Results: 5808 children under 19 became known to Children{\textquoteright}s Social Care during the study, 377 of whom subsequently became looked after. Black and Asian children were more likely to become looked after, as were those known to social care services pre-birth or in the first year. Key risk factors that increased hazard of becoming looked after were neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, drug and/or alcohol use in the household or the child and mental ill health in the household. Children who had a Child in Need intervention were less likely to become looked after. Children who had a Child Protection Plan were more likely to become looked after. Conclusion: In our study of routinely collected Children{\textquoteright}s Social Care data, we have identified the key factors that increased the hazard of a child becoming looked after. These findings highlight potential areas for service change and can be used to inform risk prediction and preventative action, however, the local context may influence the generalisability of our findings to other settings.",
keywords = "Sociodemographic Factors, Public Health, Statistics and Numerical Data",
author = "Philip McHale and Lu{\'i}s Filipe and Sarah Hodgson and Davara Bennett and Benjamin Barr",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1136/bmjph-2024-001130",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "BMJ Public Health",
issn = "2753-4294",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services?

T2 - A survival analysis of Children’s Social Care data in Liverpool

AU - McHale, Philip

AU - Filipe, Luís

AU - Hodgson, Sarah

AU - Bennett, Davara

AU - Barr, Benjamin

PY - 2024/10/7

Y1 - 2024/10/7

N2 - Background: Increasing numbers of children in the UK are being taken into care, with adverse consequences for children and unsustainable costs for local government. It is crucial that local authorities better understand which children are most at risk to target preventative interventions. Objectives: To identify predictors of children becoming ‘looked after’ (taken into care by the state) among children known to a local authority. Methods: Secondary analysis of routinely collected Children’s Social Care data including all children who first became known to social care in Liverpool between April 2019 and March 2022, (excluding unaccompanied asylum seeker children). Outcome was time (in months) between first contact with social care and either becoming looked after or reaching the censoring date (March 2022). Survival analysis was undertaken using a discrete time hazard model. Results: 5808 children under 19 became known to Children’s Social Care during the study, 377 of whom subsequently became looked after. Black and Asian children were more likely to become looked after, as were those known to social care services pre-birth or in the first year. Key risk factors that increased hazard of becoming looked after were neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, drug and/or alcohol use in the household or the child and mental ill health in the household. Children who had a Child in Need intervention were less likely to become looked after. Children who had a Child Protection Plan were more likely to become looked after. Conclusion: In our study of routinely collected Children’s Social Care data, we have identified the key factors that increased the hazard of a child becoming looked after. These findings highlight potential areas for service change and can be used to inform risk prediction and preventative action, however, the local context may influence the generalisability of our findings to other settings.

AB - Background: Increasing numbers of children in the UK are being taken into care, with adverse consequences for children and unsustainable costs for local government. It is crucial that local authorities better understand which children are most at risk to target preventative interventions. Objectives: To identify predictors of children becoming ‘looked after’ (taken into care by the state) among children known to a local authority. Methods: Secondary analysis of routinely collected Children’s Social Care data including all children who first became known to social care in Liverpool between April 2019 and March 2022, (excluding unaccompanied asylum seeker children). Outcome was time (in months) between first contact with social care and either becoming looked after or reaching the censoring date (March 2022). Survival analysis was undertaken using a discrete time hazard model. Results: 5808 children under 19 became known to Children’s Social Care during the study, 377 of whom subsequently became looked after. Black and Asian children were more likely to become looked after, as were those known to social care services pre-birth or in the first year. Key risk factors that increased hazard of becoming looked after were neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, drug and/or alcohol use in the household or the child and mental ill health in the household. Children who had a Child in Need intervention were less likely to become looked after. Children who had a Child Protection Plan were more likely to become looked after. Conclusion: In our study of routinely collected Children’s Social Care data, we have identified the key factors that increased the hazard of a child becoming looked after. These findings highlight potential areas for service change and can be used to inform risk prediction and preventative action, however, the local context may influence the generalisability of our findings to other settings.

KW - Sociodemographic Factors

KW - Public Health

KW - Statistics and Numerical Data

U2 - 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001130

DO - 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001130

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

JO - BMJ Public Health

JF - BMJ Public Health

SN - 2753-4294

IS - 2

M1 - e001130

ER -