Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should I...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do?

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do? / Johnson, Matthew Thomas.
Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance. ed. / Matthew Thomas Johnson. Springer, 2013. p. 97-119.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Johnson, MT 2013, What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do? in MT Johnson (ed.), Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance. Springer, pp. 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313799_5

APA

Johnson, M. T. (2013). What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do? In M. T. Johnson (Ed.), Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance (pp. 97-119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313799_5

Vancouver

Johnson MT. What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do? In Johnson MT, editor, Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance. Springer. 2013. p. 97-119 doi: 10.1057/9781137313799_5

Author

Johnson, Matthew Thomas. / What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do?. Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance. editor / Matthew Thomas Johnson. Springer, 2013. pp. 97-119

Bibtex

@inbook{b92e3c2f315f40d39de11687b1d640bf,
title = "What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do?",
abstract = "The concept of culture is deeply contested. Between 1920 and 1950 alone, at least one-hundred-and-fifty- seven definitions were presented (Kroeber and Kluckhohn 1952, 149). Having undergone dramatic transformation over the course of at least two centuries, the notion of culture is ubiquitous in political discourse yet conceptually elusive. Core debates revolve around the content of culture, its relationship to society and civilization as well as its function and role in the human condition. Having deliberately dealt vaguely with the term thus far, the aim of this chapter is to examine three related questions: Of what does culture consist? What does culture do? and What should culture do? Using eudaimonia and the normative account of social goods developed so far as reference points, I examine symbolic, functionalist and structurationalist approaches to culture in order to develop an account suitable for present analytical purposes. The account I develop is fairly sweeping and the examination of the field somewhat cursory. However, consideration of the relationship between the content of culture, its purpose, its association with society and the wholeness of {\textquoteleft}cultures{\textquoteright} suffices to open up key concerns about its current treatment by culturalists, in particular. The conclusions I draw are that: talk of {\textquoteleft}cultures{\textquoteright} should be replaced by talk of {\textquoteleft}culture{\textquoteright}, with recognition of the mass of complexities which enter into our cultural lives; culture should serve particular ends; the culture of relevance to political discussion is that which shapes basic institutions and that these institutions should be guided by three core values. In essence, I defend a normative functionalist account in which culture should serve certain ends. I begin by examining the history of the concept of culture. ",
author = "Johnson, {Matthew Thomas}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1057/9781137313799_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781349333769",
pages = "97--119",
editor = "{ Johnson}, {Matthew Thomas}",
booktitle = "Evaluating Culture",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What Should It Do?

AU - Johnson, Matthew Thomas

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The concept of culture is deeply contested. Between 1920 and 1950 alone, at least one-hundred-and-fifty- seven definitions were presented (Kroeber and Kluckhohn 1952, 149). Having undergone dramatic transformation over the course of at least two centuries, the notion of culture is ubiquitous in political discourse yet conceptually elusive. Core debates revolve around the content of culture, its relationship to society and civilization as well as its function and role in the human condition. Having deliberately dealt vaguely with the term thus far, the aim of this chapter is to examine three related questions: Of what does culture consist? What does culture do? and What should culture do? Using eudaimonia and the normative account of social goods developed so far as reference points, I examine symbolic, functionalist and structurationalist approaches to culture in order to develop an account suitable for present analytical purposes. The account I develop is fairly sweeping and the examination of the field somewhat cursory. However, consideration of the relationship between the content of culture, its purpose, its association with society and the wholeness of ‘cultures’ suffices to open up key concerns about its current treatment by culturalists, in particular. The conclusions I draw are that: talk of ‘cultures’ should be replaced by talk of ‘culture’, with recognition of the mass of complexities which enter into our cultural lives; culture should serve particular ends; the culture of relevance to political discussion is that which shapes basic institutions and that these institutions should be guided by three core values. In essence, I defend a normative functionalist account in which culture should serve certain ends. I begin by examining the history of the concept of culture.

AB - The concept of culture is deeply contested. Between 1920 and 1950 alone, at least one-hundred-and-fifty- seven definitions were presented (Kroeber and Kluckhohn 1952, 149). Having undergone dramatic transformation over the course of at least two centuries, the notion of culture is ubiquitous in political discourse yet conceptually elusive. Core debates revolve around the content of culture, its relationship to society and civilization as well as its function and role in the human condition. Having deliberately dealt vaguely with the term thus far, the aim of this chapter is to examine three related questions: Of what does culture consist? What does culture do? and What should culture do? Using eudaimonia and the normative account of social goods developed so far as reference points, I examine symbolic, functionalist and structurationalist approaches to culture in order to develop an account suitable for present analytical purposes. The account I develop is fairly sweeping and the examination of the field somewhat cursory. However, consideration of the relationship between the content of culture, its purpose, its association with society and the wholeness of ‘cultures’ suffices to open up key concerns about its current treatment by culturalists, in particular. The conclusions I draw are that: talk of ‘cultures’ should be replaced by talk of ‘culture’, with recognition of the mass of complexities which enter into our cultural lives; culture should serve particular ends; the culture of relevance to political discussion is that which shapes basic institutions and that these institutions should be guided by three core values. In essence, I defend a normative functionalist account in which culture should serve certain ends. I begin by examining the history of the concept of culture.

U2 - 10.1057/9781137313799_5

DO - 10.1057/9781137313799_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781349333769

SN - 9781137313799

SP - 97

EP - 119

BT - Evaluating Culture

A2 - Johnson, Matthew Thomas

PB - Springer

ER -