Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What works? A grounded theory investigation int...

Research

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training

Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training. / Juul, Juul.
Lancaster University, 2023. 256 p.

Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis

Harvard

Juul, J 2023, 'What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training', PhD, Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168

APA

Juul, J. (2023). What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168

Vancouver

Juul J. What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training. Lancaster University, 2023. 256 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168

Author

Juul, Juul. / What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training. Lancaster University, 2023. 256 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{a1abba373c35469ab5c9d6b885c9ba81,
title = "What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training",
abstract = "Purpose: Psychologists are becoming increasingly more expected to offer consultation to support staff to deliver more effective care in healthcare services. The aim of this systematic review was to explore any themes reported in the literature in greater depth in order to provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms that contribute to effective consultation. Method: Six databases were searched using a Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), identifying 15 qualitative studies, which were quality-assessed using an adapted version of the CASP checklist. A meta-ethnographic approach was taken when analysing thestudies looking at the experience of consultation from the perspectives of multidisciplinary, non-psychology staff. This included nurses, support workers, medical doctors, social workers, occupational therapists and managerial staff. Across the studies, the number of participants ranged from 5-57 with 70% of them being female, and with an age ranging from 18-65. Results: Six themes were developed highlighting the key aspects that were important to consider for effective consultation. Staff stressed the importance for consultation to helpcontain their emotional needs, to understand and connect with their clients and to feel their preference for an expert or collaborative approach to be considered. Conclusion:Recommendations for future clinical psychologists included clarifying the goals of consultation to reduce anxiety, be more accessible and flexible and adapt their language to staff preference in order to facilitate trusting relationships and more effective consultation. Future research should explore staff need and benefit of consultation by comparing experiences across other services and approaches to consultation.",
author = "Juul Juul",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - What works? A grounded theory investigation into the impact of non-psychology staff using Solution-Focused Brief Therapy following brief training

AU - Juul, Juul

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Purpose: Psychologists are becoming increasingly more expected to offer consultation to support staff to deliver more effective care in healthcare services. The aim of this systematic review was to explore any themes reported in the literature in greater depth in order to provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms that contribute to effective consultation. Method: Six databases were searched using a Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), identifying 15 qualitative studies, which were quality-assessed using an adapted version of the CASP checklist. A meta-ethnographic approach was taken when analysing thestudies looking at the experience of consultation from the perspectives of multidisciplinary, non-psychology staff. This included nurses, support workers, medical doctors, social workers, occupational therapists and managerial staff. Across the studies, the number of participants ranged from 5-57 with 70% of them being female, and with an age ranging from 18-65. Results: Six themes were developed highlighting the key aspects that were important to consider for effective consultation. Staff stressed the importance for consultation to helpcontain their emotional needs, to understand and connect with their clients and to feel their preference for an expert or collaborative approach to be considered. Conclusion:Recommendations for future clinical psychologists included clarifying the goals of consultation to reduce anxiety, be more accessible and flexible and adapt their language to staff preference in order to facilitate trusting relationships and more effective consultation. Future research should explore staff need and benefit of consultation by comparing experiences across other services and approaches to consultation.

AB - Purpose: Psychologists are becoming increasingly more expected to offer consultation to support staff to deliver more effective care in healthcare services. The aim of this systematic review was to explore any themes reported in the literature in greater depth in order to provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms that contribute to effective consultation. Method: Six databases were searched using a Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), identifying 15 qualitative studies, which were quality-assessed using an adapted version of the CASP checklist. A meta-ethnographic approach was taken when analysing thestudies looking at the experience of consultation from the perspectives of multidisciplinary, non-psychology staff. This included nurses, support workers, medical doctors, social workers, occupational therapists and managerial staff. Across the studies, the number of participants ranged from 5-57 with 70% of them being female, and with an age ranging from 18-65. Results: Six themes were developed highlighting the key aspects that were important to consider for effective consultation. Staff stressed the importance for consultation to helpcontain their emotional needs, to understand and connect with their clients and to feel their preference for an expert or collaborative approach to be considered. Conclusion:Recommendations for future clinical psychologists included clarifying the goals of consultation to reduce anxiety, be more accessible and flexible and adapt their language to staff preference in order to facilitate trusting relationships and more effective consultation. Future research should explore staff need and benefit of consultation by comparing experiences across other services and approaches to consultation.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2168

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -