Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What works? A grounded theory investigation of ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy. / Juul, Haakon; Bray, Dominic; Smith, Ian C.
In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 17.08.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Juul, H., Bray, D., & Smith, I. C. (2025). What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70009

Vancouver

Juul H, Bray D, Smith IC. What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2025 Aug 17. Epub 2025 Aug 17. doi: 10.1111/papt.70009

Author

Juul, Haakon ; Bray, Dominic ; Smith, Ian C. / What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy. In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{7219c4cdc10b4d9da3444b39146ce45e,
title = "What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy",
abstract = "Objective: As part of a task‐sharing strategy, clinical psychologists are becoming increasingly expected to offer therapy training for staff in health care services to develop psychological mindedness to increase access and provision of psychological support for clients. The current study explored how 10 staff working in health care settings experienced Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) training and how they subsequently used it. Methods: One‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants; a constructivist grounded theory (GT) approach was used to generate a model based on the participants' reflections after the training. Results: Staff shared how they felt they needed evidence of SFBT effectiveness in order to believe that learning a new model would be worth the required investment. They also found realistic role modelling that was relevant to their context to be particularly convincing as well as regular support from their peers and multidisciplinary meetings. Participants also shared some barriers to using SFBT in practice, including time‐restricted clinics, service pressures and challenging clients. Conclusion: The model describes a complex dynamic between personal, interpersonal and systemic factors that influenced the staff members' individual decision to abandon the more familiar medical model that represented a sense of comfort and safety. The study includes recommendations for how clinical psychologists can address the identified facilitators and barriers to facilitate more effective training programmes and training transfer.",
keywords = "grounded theory, non‐psychology staff, multidisciplinary staff, Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy, brief therapy training, medical settings",
author = "Haakon Juul and Dominic Bray and Smith, {Ian C.}",
year = "2025",
month = aug,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/papt.70009",
language = "English",
journal = "Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1476-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What works? A grounded theory investigation of training non‐psychology staff in using Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy

AU - Juul, Haakon

AU - Bray, Dominic

AU - Smith, Ian C.

PY - 2025/8/17

Y1 - 2025/8/17

N2 - Objective: As part of a task‐sharing strategy, clinical psychologists are becoming increasingly expected to offer therapy training for staff in health care services to develop psychological mindedness to increase access and provision of psychological support for clients. The current study explored how 10 staff working in health care settings experienced Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) training and how they subsequently used it. Methods: One‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants; a constructivist grounded theory (GT) approach was used to generate a model based on the participants' reflections after the training. Results: Staff shared how they felt they needed evidence of SFBT effectiveness in order to believe that learning a new model would be worth the required investment. They also found realistic role modelling that was relevant to their context to be particularly convincing as well as regular support from their peers and multidisciplinary meetings. Participants also shared some barriers to using SFBT in practice, including time‐restricted clinics, service pressures and challenging clients. Conclusion: The model describes a complex dynamic between personal, interpersonal and systemic factors that influenced the staff members' individual decision to abandon the more familiar medical model that represented a sense of comfort and safety. The study includes recommendations for how clinical psychologists can address the identified facilitators and barriers to facilitate more effective training programmes and training transfer.

AB - Objective: As part of a task‐sharing strategy, clinical psychologists are becoming increasingly expected to offer therapy training for staff in health care services to develop psychological mindedness to increase access and provision of psychological support for clients. The current study explored how 10 staff working in health care settings experienced Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) training and how they subsequently used it. Methods: One‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants; a constructivist grounded theory (GT) approach was used to generate a model based on the participants' reflections after the training. Results: Staff shared how they felt they needed evidence of SFBT effectiveness in order to believe that learning a new model would be worth the required investment. They also found realistic role modelling that was relevant to their context to be particularly convincing as well as regular support from their peers and multidisciplinary meetings. Participants also shared some barriers to using SFBT in practice, including time‐restricted clinics, service pressures and challenging clients. Conclusion: The model describes a complex dynamic between personal, interpersonal and systemic factors that influenced the staff members' individual decision to abandon the more familiar medical model that represented a sense of comfort and safety. The study includes recommendations for how clinical psychologists can address the identified facilitators and barriers to facilitate more effective training programmes and training transfer.

KW - grounded theory

KW - non‐psychology staff

KW - multidisciplinary staff

KW - Solution‐Focused Brief Therapy

KW - brief therapy training

KW - medical settings

U2 - 10.1111/papt.70009

DO - 10.1111/papt.70009

M3 - Journal article

JO - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1476-0835

ER -