Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same? / Lany, Jill; Thompson, Abbie; Aguero, Ariel.
In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 01.02.2022, p. 209-221.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lany, J, Thompson, A & Aguero, A 2022, 'What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same?', Developmental Psychology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001084

APA

Lany, J., Thompson, A., & Aguero, A. (2022). What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same? Developmental Psychology, 58(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001084

Vancouver

Lany J, Thompson A, Aguero A. What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same? Developmental Psychology. 2022 Feb 1;58(2):209-221. doi: 10.1037/dev0001084

Author

Lany, Jill ; Thompson, Abbie ; Aguero, Ariel. / What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same?. In: Developmental Psychology. 2022 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 209-221.

Bibtex

@article{5518eb0b746649c59a1fc89fecdf224d,
title = "What{\textquoteright}s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same?",
abstract = "Words influence cognition well before infants know their meanings. For example, three-month-olds are more likely to form visually based categories when exemplars are paired with spoken words than with sine-wave tones, a likely precursor to learning symbolic relations between words and their referents. However, it is unclear why words have these effects. In 3 experiments we tested the hypothesis that exaggerated “showing” gestures used when naming objects, and the resultant cross-modal synchrony between a name and object motion, can affect object categorization. Participants were 119 3-month-old infants (56 were female and 63 were male). According to caregiver report, the sample was composed of European American (N = 114) Black (N = 6), Hispanic (N = 2) and multiracial (N = 6) infants. Participants were growing up predominantly in homes with at least 1 parent who completed a college education or a higher degree (80%), and the remaining 20% completed high school. After replicating evidence that words and tones have different effects on categorization, we found that prefamiliarizing infants with tone-object synchrony leads tones to influence categorization as words do. Moreover, we found that concentrated experience with word-object synchrony enhances the effects that words themselves have on categorization.",
keywords = "Amodal relations, Categorization, Language acquisition, Language and thought",
author = "Jill Lany and Abbie Thompson and Ariel Aguero",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0001084",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "209--221",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s in a name, and when can a [beep] be the same?

AU - Lany, Jill

AU - Thompson, Abbie

AU - Aguero, Ariel

PY - 2022/2/1

Y1 - 2022/2/1

N2 - Words influence cognition well before infants know their meanings. For example, three-month-olds are more likely to form visually based categories when exemplars are paired with spoken words than with sine-wave tones, a likely precursor to learning symbolic relations between words and their referents. However, it is unclear why words have these effects. In 3 experiments we tested the hypothesis that exaggerated “showing” gestures used when naming objects, and the resultant cross-modal synchrony between a name and object motion, can affect object categorization. Participants were 119 3-month-old infants (56 were female and 63 were male). According to caregiver report, the sample was composed of European American (N = 114) Black (N = 6), Hispanic (N = 2) and multiracial (N = 6) infants. Participants were growing up predominantly in homes with at least 1 parent who completed a college education or a higher degree (80%), and the remaining 20% completed high school. After replicating evidence that words and tones have different effects on categorization, we found that prefamiliarizing infants with tone-object synchrony leads tones to influence categorization as words do. Moreover, we found that concentrated experience with word-object synchrony enhances the effects that words themselves have on categorization.

AB - Words influence cognition well before infants know their meanings. For example, three-month-olds are more likely to form visually based categories when exemplars are paired with spoken words than with sine-wave tones, a likely precursor to learning symbolic relations between words and their referents. However, it is unclear why words have these effects. In 3 experiments we tested the hypothesis that exaggerated “showing” gestures used when naming objects, and the resultant cross-modal synchrony between a name and object motion, can affect object categorization. Participants were 119 3-month-old infants (56 were female and 63 were male). According to caregiver report, the sample was composed of European American (N = 114) Black (N = 6), Hispanic (N = 2) and multiracial (N = 6) infants. Participants were growing up predominantly in homes with at least 1 parent who completed a college education or a higher degree (80%), and the remaining 20% completed high school. After replicating evidence that words and tones have different effects on categorization, we found that prefamiliarizing infants with tone-object synchrony leads tones to influence categorization as words do. Moreover, we found that concentrated experience with word-object synchrony enhances the effects that words themselves have on categorization.

KW - Amodal relations

KW - Categorization

KW - Language acquisition

KW - Language and thought

U2 - 10.1037/dev0001084

DO - 10.1037/dev0001084

M3 - Journal article

VL - 58

SP - 209

EP - 221

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 2

ER -