Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What’s my age again?

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What’s my age again?: Age categories as interactive kinds

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

What’s my age again? Age categories as interactive kinds. / Maung, Hane Htut.

In: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 43, 36, 10.03.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Maung HH. What’s my age again? Age categories as interactive kinds. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 2021 Mar 10;43:36. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00388-5

Author

Maung, Hane Htut. / What’s my age again? Age categories as interactive kinds. In: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 2021 ; Vol. 43.

Bibtex

@article{71782d4779534092860215ac48ccfc88,
title = "What{\textquoteright}s my age again?: Age categories as interactive kinds",
abstract = "This paper addresses a philosophical problem concerning the ontological status of age classification. For various purposes, people are commonly classified into categories such as “young adulthood”, “middle adulthood”, and “older adulthood”, which are defined chronologically. These age categories prima facie seem to qualify as natural kinds under a homeostatic property cluster account of natural kindhood, insofar as they capture certain biological, psychological, and social properties of people that tend to cluster together due to causal processes. However, this is challenged by the observation that age categories are historically unstable. The properties that age categories are supposed to capture are affected by healthcare and cultural developments, such that people are staying biologically, psychologically, and socially young for longer. Furthermore, the act of classifying people into age categories can bring about changes in their behaviors, which in turn alter the biological, psychological, and social properties that the categories are supposed to capture. Accordingly, I propose that age categories are best understood as interactive kinds that are influenced in dynamic ways by looping effects. I consider some implications of these looping effects for our classificatory practices concerning age, including how different disciplines may need to review the ways they define and use age categories in their inductive inferences.",
keywords = "Age, Classification, Homeostatic Proprty Cluster, Interactive Kinds, Looping Effects",
author = "Maung, {Hane Htut}",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s40656-021-00388-5",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
journal = "History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences",
issn = "0391-9714",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s my age again?

T2 - Age categories as interactive kinds

AU - Maung, Hane Htut

PY - 2021/3/10

Y1 - 2021/3/10

N2 - This paper addresses a philosophical problem concerning the ontological status of age classification. For various purposes, people are commonly classified into categories such as “young adulthood”, “middle adulthood”, and “older adulthood”, which are defined chronologically. These age categories prima facie seem to qualify as natural kinds under a homeostatic property cluster account of natural kindhood, insofar as they capture certain biological, psychological, and social properties of people that tend to cluster together due to causal processes. However, this is challenged by the observation that age categories are historically unstable. The properties that age categories are supposed to capture are affected by healthcare and cultural developments, such that people are staying biologically, psychologically, and socially young for longer. Furthermore, the act of classifying people into age categories can bring about changes in their behaviors, which in turn alter the biological, psychological, and social properties that the categories are supposed to capture. Accordingly, I propose that age categories are best understood as interactive kinds that are influenced in dynamic ways by looping effects. I consider some implications of these looping effects for our classificatory practices concerning age, including how different disciplines may need to review the ways they define and use age categories in their inductive inferences.

AB - This paper addresses a philosophical problem concerning the ontological status of age classification. For various purposes, people are commonly classified into categories such as “young adulthood”, “middle adulthood”, and “older adulthood”, which are defined chronologically. These age categories prima facie seem to qualify as natural kinds under a homeostatic property cluster account of natural kindhood, insofar as they capture certain biological, psychological, and social properties of people that tend to cluster together due to causal processes. However, this is challenged by the observation that age categories are historically unstable. The properties that age categories are supposed to capture are affected by healthcare and cultural developments, such that people are staying biologically, psychologically, and socially young for longer. Furthermore, the act of classifying people into age categories can bring about changes in their behaviors, which in turn alter the biological, psychological, and social properties that the categories are supposed to capture. Accordingly, I propose that age categories are best understood as interactive kinds that are influenced in dynamic ways by looping effects. I consider some implications of these looping effects for our classificatory practices concerning age, including how different disciplines may need to review the ways they define and use age categories in their inductive inferences.

KW - Age

KW - Classification

KW - Homeostatic Proprty Cluster

KW - Interactive Kinds

KW - Looping Effects

U2 - 10.1007/s40656-021-00388-5

DO - 10.1007/s40656-021-00388-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

JO - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

JF - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

SN - 0391-9714

M1 - 36

ER -