Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopil...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. / Coulon, Frederic; Al Awadi, Mohammed; Cowie, William et al.

In: Environmental Pollution, Vol. 158, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 3032-3040.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Coulon, F, Al Awadi, M, Cowie, W, Mardlin, D, Pollard, S, Cunningham, C, Risdon, G, Arthur, P, Semple, KT & Paton, GI 2010, 'When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial', Environmental Pollution, vol. 158, no. 10, pp. 3032-3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001

APA

Coulon, F., Al Awadi, M., Cowie, W., Mardlin, D., Pollard, S., Cunningham, C., Risdon, G., Arthur, P., Semple, K. T., & Paton, G. I. (2010). When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environmental Pollution, 158(10), 3032-3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001

Vancouver

Coulon F, Al Awadi M, Cowie W, Mardlin D, Pollard S, Cunningham C et al. When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environmental Pollution. 2010 Oct;158(10):3032-3040. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001

Author

Coulon, Frederic ; Al Awadi, Mohammed ; Cowie, William et al. / When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. In: Environmental Pollution. 2010 ; Vol. 158, No. 10. pp. 3032-3040.

Bibtex

@article{0376f2c22ae8456aa07d53fbf7602fd9,
title = "When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial",
abstract = "A six month field scale study was carried out to compare windrow turning and biopile techniques for the remediation of soil contaminated with bunker C fuel oil. End-point clean-up targets were defined by human risk assessment and ecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches. Replicate windrows and biopiles were amended with either nutrients and inocula, nutrients alone or no amendment. In addition to fractionated hydrocarbon analysis, culturable microbial characterisation and soil ecotoxicological assays were performed. This particular soil, heavy in texture and historically contaminated with bunker fuel was more effectively remediated by windrowing, but coarser textures may be more amendable to biopiling. This trial reveals the benefit of developing risk and hazard based approaches in defining end-point bioremediation of heavy hydrocarbons when engineered biopile or windrow are proposed as treatment option. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Bunker fuel, Windrows, Biopiles, Bioremediation, Soil ecotoxicology",
author = "Frederic Coulon and {Al Awadi}, Mohammed and William Cowie and David Mardlin and Simon Pollard and Colin Cunningham and Graeme Risdon and Paul Arthur and Semple, {Kirk T.} and Paton, {Graeme I.}",
year = "2010",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "3032--3040",
journal = "Environmental Pollution",
issn = "0269-7491",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial

AU - Coulon, Frederic

AU - Al Awadi, Mohammed

AU - Cowie, William

AU - Mardlin, David

AU - Pollard, Simon

AU - Cunningham, Colin

AU - Risdon, Graeme

AU - Arthur, Paul

AU - Semple, Kirk T.

AU - Paton, Graeme I.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - A six month field scale study was carried out to compare windrow turning and biopile techniques for the remediation of soil contaminated with bunker C fuel oil. End-point clean-up targets were defined by human risk assessment and ecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches. Replicate windrows and biopiles were amended with either nutrients and inocula, nutrients alone or no amendment. In addition to fractionated hydrocarbon analysis, culturable microbial characterisation and soil ecotoxicological assays were performed. This particular soil, heavy in texture and historically contaminated with bunker fuel was more effectively remediated by windrowing, but coarser textures may be more amendable to biopiling. This trial reveals the benefit of developing risk and hazard based approaches in defining end-point bioremediation of heavy hydrocarbons when engineered biopile or windrow are proposed as treatment option. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - A six month field scale study was carried out to compare windrow turning and biopile techniques for the remediation of soil contaminated with bunker C fuel oil. End-point clean-up targets were defined by human risk assessment and ecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches. Replicate windrows and biopiles were amended with either nutrients and inocula, nutrients alone or no amendment. In addition to fractionated hydrocarbon analysis, culturable microbial characterisation and soil ecotoxicological assays were performed. This particular soil, heavy in texture and historically contaminated with bunker fuel was more effectively remediated by windrowing, but coarser textures may be more amendable to biopiling. This trial reveals the benefit of developing risk and hazard based approaches in defining end-point bioremediation of heavy hydrocarbons when engineered biopile or windrow are proposed as treatment option. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Bunker fuel

KW - Windrows

KW - Biopiles

KW - Bioremediation

KW - Soil ecotoxicology

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 158

SP - 3032

EP - 3040

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

SN - 0269-7491

IS - 10

ER -