Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > When smiles (and frowns) speak words

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

When smiles (and frowns) speak words: Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

When smiles (and frowns) speak words: Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions? / Leach, Stefan; Weick, Mario.
In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 111, No. 4, 01.11.2020, p. 683-701.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Leach S, Weick M. When smiles (and frowns) speak words: Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions? British Journal of Psychology. 2020 Nov 1;111(4):683-701. Epub 2020 Jan 3. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12433

Author

Bibtex

@article{6f6b9183891f4df2b02417bde0faa32a,
title = "When smiles (and frowns) speak words: Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions?",
abstract = "Self-reported experiences are often poor indicators of outward expressions. Here we examine social power as a variable that may impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions. Earlier studies addressing this issue were limited by focusing on a single facial expression (smiling) and by using different, less sensitive methods that yielded mostly null results. Sampling, for the first time, self-reported affect repeatedly in response to different negative, neutral and positive stimuli, and measuring concurrent facial muscle activation via electromyography, we found that high power (vs. baseline) increased the correspondence between self-reported positive affect and smiling. There was also an indication that high power (vs. baseline) bolstered the association between self-reported negative affect and frowning but the effect did not pass more stringent criteria for significance (p ≤.005) and was therefore deemed inconclusive. The prediction that low power (vs. baseline) decreases the correspondence between self-reported affect and smiling and frowning facial expressions was not supported. Taken together, it would appear that (high) power can impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions, but it remains to be seen whether this effect extends beyond smiling facial expressions.",
keywords = "affect, electromyography, facial expression, power",
author = "Stefan Leach and Mario Weick",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The British Psychological Society",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bjop.12433",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "683--701",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When smiles (and frowns) speak words

T2 - Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions?

AU - Leach, Stefan

AU - Weick, Mario

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The British Psychological Society

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - Self-reported experiences are often poor indicators of outward expressions. Here we examine social power as a variable that may impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions. Earlier studies addressing this issue were limited by focusing on a single facial expression (smiling) and by using different, less sensitive methods that yielded mostly null results. Sampling, for the first time, self-reported affect repeatedly in response to different negative, neutral and positive stimuli, and measuring concurrent facial muscle activation via electromyography, we found that high power (vs. baseline) increased the correspondence between self-reported positive affect and smiling. There was also an indication that high power (vs. baseline) bolstered the association between self-reported negative affect and frowning but the effect did not pass more stringent criteria for significance (p ≤.005) and was therefore deemed inconclusive. The prediction that low power (vs. baseline) decreases the correspondence between self-reported affect and smiling and frowning facial expressions was not supported. Taken together, it would appear that (high) power can impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions, but it remains to be seen whether this effect extends beyond smiling facial expressions.

AB - Self-reported experiences are often poor indicators of outward expressions. Here we examine social power as a variable that may impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions. Earlier studies addressing this issue were limited by focusing on a single facial expression (smiling) and by using different, less sensitive methods that yielded mostly null results. Sampling, for the first time, self-reported affect repeatedly in response to different negative, neutral and positive stimuli, and measuring concurrent facial muscle activation via electromyography, we found that high power (vs. baseline) increased the correspondence between self-reported positive affect and smiling. There was also an indication that high power (vs. baseline) bolstered the association between self-reported negative affect and frowning but the effect did not pass more stringent criteria for significance (p ≤.005) and was therefore deemed inconclusive. The prediction that low power (vs. baseline) decreases the correspondence between self-reported affect and smiling and frowning facial expressions was not supported. Taken together, it would appear that (high) power can impact the relationship between self-reported affect and facial expressions, but it remains to be seen whether this effect extends beyond smiling facial expressions.

KW - affect

KW - electromyography

KW - facial expression

KW - power

U2 - 10.1111/bjop.12433

DO - 10.1111/bjop.12433

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31899554

AN - SCOPUS:85077886226

VL - 111

SP - 683

EP - 701

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 4

ER -