Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘When the walls come tumbling down'

Electronic data

  • pre-print

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dixon, J., Tredoux, C., Sturgeon, B., Hocking, B., Davies, G., Huck, J., Whyatt, D., Jarman, N. and Bryan, D. (2020), ‘When the walls come tumbling down’: The role of intergroup proximity, threat, and contact in shaping attitudes towards the removal of Northern Ireland’s peace walls. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 59 (4) doi:10.1111/bjso.12370 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12370/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.8 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘When the walls come tumbling down': The role of intergroup proximity, threat and contact in shaping attitudes towards the removal of Northern Ireland’s peace walls.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/10/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>British Journal of Social Psychology
Issue number4
Volume59
Number of pages23
Pages (from-to)922-944
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date17/02/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Institutional structures of segregation typically entrench social inequality and sustain wider patterns of intergroup conflict and discrimination. However, initiatives to dismantle such structures may provoke resistance. Executive proposals to dismantle Northern Ireland’s peace walls by 2023 provide a compelling case study of the nature of such resistance and may thus provide important clues about how it might be overcome. Drawing on a field survey conducted in north Belfast (n = 488), this research explored the role of physical proximity, realistic and symbolic threat, and past experiences of positive and negative cross-community contact on Catholic and Protestant residents’ support for removing the walls. Structural equation modelling suggested that both forms of contact and proximity were significantly related to such support and that these relationships were partially mediated by realistic threat. It also suggested that positive contact moderated the effects of proximity. That is, for residents who had more frequent positive interactions with members of the other community, proximity to a peace wall had a weaker relationship with resistance to their removal than residents who had less frequent contact.

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dixon, J., Tredoux, C., Sturgeon, B., Hocking, B., Davies, G., Huck, J., Whyatt, D., Jarman, N. and Bryan, D. (2020), ‘When the walls come tumbling down’: The role of intergroup proximity, threat, and contact in shaping attitudes towards the removal of Northern Ireland’s peace walls. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 59 (4) doi:10.1111/bjso.12370 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12370/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.