Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Who ensures that Society has the professionals ...

Electronic data

  • 200930_A_Single_European_Higher_Education_Area_FULL_NOT_FOR_REVIEW

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Reviews in Higher Education on 03/02/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290

    Accepted author manuscript, 254 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs?: Differences in the policy directions of three European countries

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs? Differences in the policy directions of three European countries. / Griffioen, Didi; Ashwin, Paul; Scholkmann, Antonia.
In: Policy Reviews in Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, 31.07.2021, p. 158-173.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Griffioen D, Ashwin P, Scholkmann A. Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs? Differences in the policy directions of three European countries. Policy Reviews in Higher Education. 2021 Jul 31;5(2):158-173. Epub 2021 Feb 3. doi: 10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290

Author

Griffioen, Didi ; Ashwin, Paul ; Scholkmann, Antonia. / Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs? Differences in the policy directions of three European countries. In: Policy Reviews in Higher Education. 2021 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 158-173.

Bibtex

@article{4f002df2e96847beb52ff82ccdc006b6,
title = "Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs?: Differences in the policy directions of three European countries",
abstract = "In this article, we examine how policy documents from three European countries – the Netherlands, Germany and England – position a key outcome of higher education: the development of high-level professionals. Our findings show significant differences between the policies in the three countries in terms of in definitions of high-level professionals, the characterization of the education needed to produce high-level professionals, and the mechanisms identified as ensuring the production of high-level professionals. Our findings show that in order to develop a comparative understanding of higher education outcomes across the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), it is necessary to examine the strategic and visionary perspective of national policies in different EHEA countries. This is significant given that the EHEA{\textquoteright}s claim to ensure common outcomes across its higher education systems.",
keywords = "Higher education, policy, steering mechanisms, comparative analysis",
author = "Didi Griffioen and Paul Ashwin and Antonia Scholkmann",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Reviews in Higher Education on 03/02/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "158--173",
journal = "Policy Reviews in Higher Education",
issn = "2332-2969",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who ensures that Society has the professionals it needs?

T2 - Differences in the policy directions of three European countries

AU - Griffioen, Didi

AU - Ashwin, Paul

AU - Scholkmann, Antonia

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Reviews in Higher Education on 03/02/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290

PY - 2021/7/31

Y1 - 2021/7/31

N2 - In this article, we examine how policy documents from three European countries – the Netherlands, Germany and England – position a key outcome of higher education: the development of high-level professionals. Our findings show significant differences between the policies in the three countries in terms of in definitions of high-level professionals, the characterization of the education needed to produce high-level professionals, and the mechanisms identified as ensuring the production of high-level professionals. Our findings show that in order to develop a comparative understanding of higher education outcomes across the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), it is necessary to examine the strategic and visionary perspective of national policies in different EHEA countries. This is significant given that the EHEA’s claim to ensure common outcomes across its higher education systems.

AB - In this article, we examine how policy documents from three European countries – the Netherlands, Germany and England – position a key outcome of higher education: the development of high-level professionals. Our findings show significant differences between the policies in the three countries in terms of in definitions of high-level professionals, the characterization of the education needed to produce high-level professionals, and the mechanisms identified as ensuring the production of high-level professionals. Our findings show that in order to develop a comparative understanding of higher education outcomes across the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), it is necessary to examine the strategic and visionary perspective of national policies in different EHEA countries. This is significant given that the EHEA’s claim to ensure common outcomes across its higher education systems.

KW - Higher education

KW - policy

KW - steering mechanisms

KW - comparative analysis

U2 - 10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290

DO - 10.1080/23322969.2021.1880290

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 158

EP - 173

JO - Policy Reviews in Higher Education

JF - Policy Reviews in Higher Education

SN - 2332-2969

IS - 2

ER -