Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than a woman, less than a man

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than a woman, less than a man. / Menshawy, M.
In: British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 20.02.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Menshawy M. Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than a woman, less than a man. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 2025 Feb 20. Epub 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1080/13530194.2025.2458659

Author

Menshawy, M. / Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than a woman, less than a man. In: British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{b7f864064fac44769bf4f367f224216c,
title = "Why Arabs hate their leaders{\textquoteright} wives? More than a woman, less than a man",
abstract = "During the Arab Spring, anti-regime demonstrations involved shouts and slogans specifically targeting the wives of authoritarian leaders and their identities as women instead of directly targeting their brutal husband-leaders. This is often explained by characterizing these women as {\textquoteleft}easy targets{\textquoteright}. The article challenges this explanation by demonstrating how the leaders{\textquoteright} wives in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan were key agents of authoritarianism, contributing to and benefitting from it through their positions both as political allies (as members of the ruling elites) and as women. Their contributions include oppressing and de-politicizing other women as part of a performance of {\textquoteleft}hegemonic femininity{\textquoteright}, infiltrating civil society organizations, and making their husbands look good and democratic through public diplomacy activities. The benefits they accrue include access to state media and state funds. The negative public reaction can be understood as costs incurred by the leader and his wife due to their trade-off in the payment system.",
author = "M. Menshawy",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/13530194.2025.2458659",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies",
issn = "1353-0194",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Arabs hate their leaders’ wives? More than a woman, less than a man

AU - Menshawy, M.

PY - 2025/2/20

Y1 - 2025/2/20

N2 - During the Arab Spring, anti-regime demonstrations involved shouts and slogans specifically targeting the wives of authoritarian leaders and their identities as women instead of directly targeting their brutal husband-leaders. This is often explained by characterizing these women as ‘easy targets’. The article challenges this explanation by demonstrating how the leaders’ wives in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan were key agents of authoritarianism, contributing to and benefitting from it through their positions both as political allies (as members of the ruling elites) and as women. Their contributions include oppressing and de-politicizing other women as part of a performance of ‘hegemonic femininity’, infiltrating civil society organizations, and making their husbands look good and democratic through public diplomacy activities. The benefits they accrue include access to state media and state funds. The negative public reaction can be understood as costs incurred by the leader and his wife due to their trade-off in the payment system.

AB - During the Arab Spring, anti-regime demonstrations involved shouts and slogans specifically targeting the wives of authoritarian leaders and their identities as women instead of directly targeting their brutal husband-leaders. This is often explained by characterizing these women as ‘easy targets’. The article challenges this explanation by demonstrating how the leaders’ wives in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan were key agents of authoritarianism, contributing to and benefitting from it through their positions both as political allies (as members of the ruling elites) and as women. Their contributions include oppressing and de-politicizing other women as part of a performance of ‘hegemonic femininity’, infiltrating civil society organizations, and making their husbands look good and democratic through public diplomacy activities. The benefits they accrue include access to state media and state funds. The negative public reaction can be understood as costs incurred by the leader and his wife due to their trade-off in the payment system.

U2 - 10.1080/13530194.2025.2458659

DO - 10.1080/13530194.2025.2458659

M3 - Journal article

JO - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

JF - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

SN - 1353-0194

ER -