Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why does the probe value effect emerge in worki...

Electronic data

  • Atkinson_et_al_value_directremember

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02056-6

    Accepted author manuscript, 679 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory?: Examining the biased attentional refreshing account

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/06/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume29
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)891-900
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date28/01/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

People are able to prioritize more valuable information in working memory. The current study examined whether this value effect is due to the items of greater value being refreshed more than lower-value items during maintenance. To assess this possibility, we combined a probe value manipulation with a guided-refreshing procedure. Arrays of colored shapes were presented, and after a brief delay, participants reported the color of one randomly probed shape on a continuous color wheel. To manipulate probe value, one item was indicated as more valuable than the rest prior to encoding (i.e., worth more notional points), or all items were indicated as equally valuable. To guide refreshing, in some trials, two arrows were presented during maintenance, each arrow cueing the spatial location of one item. Participants were told to “think of” (i.e., refresh) the cued item. If value boosts are driven by attentional refreshing, cueing an item to be refreshed should enhance performance for items that are of low or equal value, but not items of high value, as these items would be refreshed regardless of the cue. This pattern of outcomes was observed, providing support for the hypothesis that attentional refreshing at least partially accounts for probe-value effects in working memory.

Bibliographic note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02056-6