Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Unpublished

Standard

Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income? / Nettle, Daniel; Johnson, Elliott; Johnson, Matthew et al.
In: PsyArXiv, 02.06.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Nettle D, Johnson E, Johnson M, Saxe R. Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income? PsyArXiv. 2020 Jun 2. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/csr3u

Author

Bibtex

@article{c9f300eb9f884e63a71b9cf0cf07826e,
title = "Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income?",
abstract = "The 2020 global COVID-19 pandemic has led to a marked increase in positive discussion of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in political and media circles. However, we do not know whether there has been a corresponding increase in support for the policy in the public at large, or why. Here, we present two studies carried out in April and May 2020 in UK and US samples. In study 1 (n=802), we find that people express much stronger support for a UBI policy for the times of the pandemic and its aftermath than for normal times. This is largely explained by the increased importance they attach to a system that is simple and efficient to administer, and that reduces stress and anxiety in society. In study 2 (n=400), we pit UBI against an equally-generous but targeted social transfer system. We find that, for pandemic times, support shifts towards UBI. This is partially explained by a number of perceived advantages, such as simplicity of administration and suitability for a changing world. Our results illustrate how a changing social and economic situation can bring about marked shifts in policy preferences, through changes in citizen{\textquoteright}s perceptions of what is currently important.",
author = "Daniel Nettle and Elliott Johnson and Matthew Johnson and Rebecca Saxe",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "2",
doi = "10.31234/osf.io/csr3u",
language = "English",
journal = "PsyArXiv",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income?

AU - Nettle, Daniel

AU - Johnson, Elliott

AU - Johnson, Matthew

AU - Saxe, Rebecca

PY - 2020/6/2

Y1 - 2020/6/2

N2 - The 2020 global COVID-19 pandemic has led to a marked increase in positive discussion of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in political and media circles. However, we do not know whether there has been a corresponding increase in support for the policy in the public at large, or why. Here, we present two studies carried out in April and May 2020 in UK and US samples. In study 1 (n=802), we find that people express much stronger support for a UBI policy for the times of the pandemic and its aftermath than for normal times. This is largely explained by the increased importance they attach to a system that is simple and efficient to administer, and that reduces stress and anxiety in society. In study 2 (n=400), we pit UBI against an equally-generous but targeted social transfer system. We find that, for pandemic times, support shifts towards UBI. This is partially explained by a number of perceived advantages, such as simplicity of administration and suitability for a changing world. Our results illustrate how a changing social and economic situation can bring about marked shifts in policy preferences, through changes in citizen’s perceptions of what is currently important.

AB - The 2020 global COVID-19 pandemic has led to a marked increase in positive discussion of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in political and media circles. However, we do not know whether there has been a corresponding increase in support for the policy in the public at large, or why. Here, we present two studies carried out in April and May 2020 in UK and US samples. In study 1 (n=802), we find that people express much stronger support for a UBI policy for the times of the pandemic and its aftermath than for normal times. This is largely explained by the increased importance they attach to a system that is simple and efficient to administer, and that reduces stress and anxiety in society. In study 2 (n=400), we pit UBI against an equally-generous but targeted social transfer system. We find that, for pandemic times, support shifts towards UBI. This is partially explained by a number of perceived advantages, such as simplicity of administration and suitability for a changing world. Our results illustrate how a changing social and economic situation can bring about marked shifts in policy preferences, through changes in citizen’s perceptions of what is currently important.

U2 - 10.31234/osf.io/csr3u

DO - 10.31234/osf.io/csr3u

M3 - Journal article

JO - PsyArXiv

JF - PsyArXiv

ER -