Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed: a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed: a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology. / Dalcher, Darren.
In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, p. 350-366.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Dalcher, D 2007, 'Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed: a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology', International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011988

APA

Vancouver

Dalcher D. Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed: a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2007;7(3):350-366. doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011988

Author

Dalcher, Darren. / Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed : a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology. In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2007 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 350-366.

Bibtex

@article{f47e60889b7848e09bf5d34cac563bde,
title = "Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed: a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology",
abstract = "In many human endeavours intelligent automation has taken over some of the tasks traditionally performed by operators, pilots or controllers. The adoption of intelligent protective technology reflects the greater degree of reliability normally ascribed to such systems. Intelligent technology is often credited with saving lives and reducing accidents. This paper looks at the crash of a revolutionary supersonic fighter that resulted from over-reliance on protection technology. The degree of automation of the protection system made it impossible for the pilot to regain control and convince the system that there was a problem. Technology has thus created a new kind of computer-assisted error, where a system designed to make a task safer is actually directly responsible for causing a disaster. Developers thus need to foresee the impact of new technology in its original situational context and consider the implications of wresting control away from the pilot and giving it to the computer",
author = "Darren Dalcher",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011988",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "350--366",
journal = "International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management",
issn = "1466-8297",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the Pilot Cannot be Blamed

T2 - a cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology

AU - Dalcher, Darren

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In many human endeavours intelligent automation has taken over some of the tasks traditionally performed by operators, pilots or controllers. The adoption of intelligent protective technology reflects the greater degree of reliability normally ascribed to such systems. Intelligent technology is often credited with saving lives and reducing accidents. This paper looks at the crash of a revolutionary supersonic fighter that resulted from over-reliance on protection technology. The degree of automation of the protection system made it impossible for the pilot to regain control and convince the system that there was a problem. Technology has thus created a new kind of computer-assisted error, where a system designed to make a task safer is actually directly responsible for causing a disaster. Developers thus need to foresee the impact of new technology in its original situational context and consider the implications of wresting control away from the pilot and giving it to the computer

AB - In many human endeavours intelligent automation has taken over some of the tasks traditionally performed by operators, pilots or controllers. The adoption of intelligent protective technology reflects the greater degree of reliability normally ascribed to such systems. Intelligent technology is often credited with saving lives and reducing accidents. This paper looks at the crash of a revolutionary supersonic fighter that resulted from over-reliance on protection technology. The degree of automation of the protection system made it impossible for the pilot to regain control and convince the system that there was a problem. Technology has thus created a new kind of computer-assisted error, where a system designed to make a task safer is actually directly responsible for causing a disaster. Developers thus need to foresee the impact of new technology in its original situational context and consider the implications of wresting control away from the pilot and giving it to the computer

U2 - 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011988

DO - 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011988

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 350

EP - 366

JO - International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management

JF - International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management

SN - 1466-8297

IS - 3

ER -