Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Winners and losers in flexible labor markets
View graph of relations

Winners and losers in flexible labor markets: the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Winners and losers in flexible labor markets: the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain. / Burström, Bo; Holland, Paula; Diderichsen, Finn et al.
In: International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2003, p. 199-217.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Burström B, Holland P, Diderichsen F, Whitehead M. Winners and losers in flexible labor markets: the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain. International Journal of Health Services. 2003;33(2):199-217. doi: 10.2190/UTC5-P2FJ-BTBA-0E3V

Author

Burström, Bo ; Holland, Paula ; Diderichsen, Finn et al. / Winners and losers in flexible labor markets : the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain. In: International Journal of Health Services. 2003 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 199-217.

Bibtex

@article{f5e5f64461ca475f9692232919b9e9fe,
title = "Winners and losers in flexible labor markets: the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain",
abstract = "This study compares employment rates among men and women with and without chronic illness in the contrasting policy environments of Britain and Sweden, through analysis of household surveys for 1979-1995. Professional and managerial groups were winners in both countries, including during recession. By the 1990s, employment rates for healthy Swedish women were uniformly high across the social groups and almost comparable with those of their male counterparts; rates for women and men with a chronic illness were also comparable, albeit at a lower overall rate. The greatest losers were male and female unskilled manual workers in Britain. British women with a chronic illness in the 1990s had less than half the employment rates of healthy women. Such social inequalities were much smaller and less consistent in Sweden, where the impact of illness was softened for all social groups. In Britain, workless men tended to be classed as unemployed or permanently sick, while workless women were more likely to be classed as looking after home/family. Lesser differences were seen in Sweden. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that women in general, and the less skilled and sick in particular, would be the winners in a more flexible, less regulated labor market-quite the reverse.",
author = "Bo Burstr{\"o}m and Paula Holland and Finn Diderichsen and Margaret Whitehead",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.2190/UTC5-P2FJ-BTBA-0E3V",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "199--217",
journal = "International Journal of Health Services",
issn = "0020-7314",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Winners and losers in flexible labor markets

T2 - the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments - Sweden and Britain

AU - Burström, Bo

AU - Holland, Paula

AU - Diderichsen, Finn

AU - Whitehead, Margaret

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This study compares employment rates among men and women with and without chronic illness in the contrasting policy environments of Britain and Sweden, through analysis of household surveys for 1979-1995. Professional and managerial groups were winners in both countries, including during recession. By the 1990s, employment rates for healthy Swedish women were uniformly high across the social groups and almost comparable with those of their male counterparts; rates for women and men with a chronic illness were also comparable, albeit at a lower overall rate. The greatest losers were male and female unskilled manual workers in Britain. British women with a chronic illness in the 1990s had less than half the employment rates of healthy women. Such social inequalities were much smaller and less consistent in Sweden, where the impact of illness was softened for all social groups. In Britain, workless men tended to be classed as unemployed or permanently sick, while workless women were more likely to be classed as looking after home/family. Lesser differences were seen in Sweden. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that women in general, and the less skilled and sick in particular, would be the winners in a more flexible, less regulated labor market-quite the reverse.

AB - This study compares employment rates among men and women with and without chronic illness in the contrasting policy environments of Britain and Sweden, through analysis of household surveys for 1979-1995. Professional and managerial groups were winners in both countries, including during recession. By the 1990s, employment rates for healthy Swedish women were uniformly high across the social groups and almost comparable with those of their male counterparts; rates for women and men with a chronic illness were also comparable, albeit at a lower overall rate. The greatest losers were male and female unskilled manual workers in Britain. British women with a chronic illness in the 1990s had less than half the employment rates of healthy women. Such social inequalities were much smaller and less consistent in Sweden, where the impact of illness was softened for all social groups. In Britain, workless men tended to be classed as unemployed or permanently sick, while workless women were more likely to be classed as looking after home/family. Lesser differences were seen in Sweden. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that women in general, and the less skilled and sick in particular, would be the winners in a more flexible, less regulated labor market-quite the reverse.

U2 - 10.2190/UTC5-P2FJ-BTBA-0E3V

DO - 10.2190/UTC5-P2FJ-BTBA-0E3V

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 12800884

VL - 33

SP - 199

EP - 217

JO - International Journal of Health Services

JF - International Journal of Health Services

SN - 0020-7314

IS - 2

ER -