Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Working with pluralism: determining quality in ...

Research

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research. / Easterby-Smith, M P V; Golden-Biddle, K; Locke, K.
In: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2008, p. 419-429.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Easterby-Smith, MPV, Golden-Biddle, K & Locke, K 2008, 'Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research', Organizational Research Methods, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108315858

APA

Easterby-Smith, M. P. V., Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2008). Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108315858

Vancouver

Easterby-Smith MPV, Golden-Biddle K, Locke K. Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods. 2008;11(3):419-429. doi: 10.1177/1094428108315858

Author

Easterby-Smith, M P V ; Golden-Biddle, K ; Locke, K. / Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research. In: Organizational Research Methods. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 419-429.

Bibtex

@article{dd12b6b4fe034e0ab07f808dc4ff23ca,
title = "Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research",
abstract = "This Feature Topic contains four articles that address the determination of quality in qualitative research by exploring the use of criteria from the perspective of reviewers, editors, and/ or authors. In this introductory article, the authors assert that these explorations represent an important move away from employing listings of static criteria to adjudicate and develop qualitative research. In its place, we see the making of quality as situated in methodological pluralism that occurs both in comparison with quantitative research and also within qualitative research. This fact complicates and enriches the task of determining quality and also suggests ways forward for the academic community.",
author = "Easterby-Smith, {M P V} and K Golden-Biddle and K Locke",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/1094428108315858",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "419--429",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research

AU - Easterby-Smith, M P V

AU - Golden-Biddle, K

AU - Locke, K

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This Feature Topic contains four articles that address the determination of quality in qualitative research by exploring the use of criteria from the perspective of reviewers, editors, and/ or authors. In this introductory article, the authors assert that these explorations represent an important move away from employing listings of static criteria to adjudicate and develop qualitative research. In its place, we see the making of quality as situated in methodological pluralism that occurs both in comparison with quantitative research and also within qualitative research. This fact complicates and enriches the task of determining quality and also suggests ways forward for the academic community.

AB - This Feature Topic contains four articles that address the determination of quality in qualitative research by exploring the use of criteria from the perspective of reviewers, editors, and/ or authors. In this introductory article, the authors assert that these explorations represent an important move away from employing listings of static criteria to adjudicate and develop qualitative research. In its place, we see the making of quality as situated in methodological pluralism that occurs both in comparison with quantitative research and also within qualitative research. This fact complicates and enriches the task of determining quality and also suggests ways forward for the academic community.

U2 - 10.1177/1094428108315858

DO - 10.1177/1094428108315858

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 419

EP - 429

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

IS - 3

ER -