Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Writing method sections in qualitative accounti...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’. / Chapman, Christopher S.; Wang, Di.
In: British Accounting Review, 10.02.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7cb6cb40cc13491885f5b1b106141415,
title = "Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through {\textquoteleft}instructively selective elaboration{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.",
author = "Chapman, {Christopher S.} and Di Wang",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591",
language = "English",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research

T2 - Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

AU - Chapman, Christopher S.

AU - Wang, Di

PY - 2025/2/10

Y1 - 2025/2/10

N2 - Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.

AB - Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591

M3 - Journal article

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

M1 - 101591

ER -