Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Wrong, but useful

Electronic data

  • journal.pone.0076277

    Rights statement: Copyright: 2013 Christley et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

    Final published version, 300 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Wrong, but useful: negotiating uncertainty in infectious disease modelling

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
Article numbere76277
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>16/10/2013
<mark>Journal</mark>PLoS ONE
Issue number10
Volume8
Number of pages13
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventLost in Translation: Living with Uncertainty in Animal Disease Management - Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, United Kingdom
Duration: 21/09/2011 → …

Conference

ConferenceLost in Translation: Living with Uncertainty in Animal Disease Management
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period21/09/11 → …

Abstract

For infectious disease dynamical models to inform policy for containment of infectious diseases the models must be able to predict; however, it is well recognised that such prediction will never be perfect. Nevertheless, the consensus is that although models are uncertain, some may yet inform effective action. This assumes that the quality of a model can be ascertained in order to evaluate sufficiently model uncertainties, and to decide whether or not, or in what ways or under what conditions, the model should be ‘used’. We examined the uncertainty in modelling, utilising a range of data: interviews with scientists, policy-makers and advisers, and analysis of policy documents, scientific publications and reports of major inquiries into key livestock epidemics. We show that the discourse of uncertainty in infectious disease models is multi-layered, flexible, contingent, embedded in context and plays a critical role in negotiating model credibility. We argue that usability and stability of a model is an outcome of the negotiation that occurs within the networks and discourses surrounding it. This negotiation employs a range of discursive devices that renders uncertainty in infectious disease modelling a plastic quality that is amenable to ‘interpretive flexibility’. The utility of models in the face of uncertainty is a function of this flexibility, the negotiation this allows, and the contexts in which model outputs are framed and interpreted in the decision making process. We contend that rather than being based predominantly on beliefs about quality, the usefulness and authority of a model may at times be primarily based on its functional status within the broad social and political environment in which it acts.

Bibliographic note

Copyright: © 2013 Christley et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.