Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Wrongful Life.

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Wrongful Life.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Wrongful Life. / Archard, David.
In: Philosophy, Vol. 79, No. 3, 07.2004, p. 403-420.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Archard, D 2004, 'Wrongful Life.', Philosophy, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819104000348

APA

Vancouver

Archard D. Wrongful Life. Philosophy. 2004 Jul;79(3):403-420. doi: 10.1017/S0031819104000348

Author

Archard, David. / Wrongful Life. In: Philosophy. 2004 ; Vol. 79, No. 3. pp. 403-420.

Bibtex

@article{9c6f7ec43b24424786173ffea29b4aae,
title = "Wrongful Life.",
abstract = "I argue that it is wrong deliberately to bring into existence an individual whose life we can reasonably expect will be of very poor quality. The individual's life would on balance be worth living but would nevertheless fall below a certain threshold. Additionally the prospective parents are unable to have any other child who would enjoy a better existence. Against the claims of John Harris and John Robertson I argue that deliberately to conceive such a child would not be to exercise the right to procreate. For this right is internally constrained by the requirement that any resultant child has the reasonable prospect of a minimally decent life.",
author = "David Archard",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Philosophy, 79 (3), pp 403-420 2004, {\textcopyright} 2004 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2004",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1017/S0031819104000348",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "403--420",
journal = "Philosophy",
issn = "0031-8191",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wrongful Life.

AU - Archard, David

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Philosophy, 79 (3), pp 403-420 2004, © 2004 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - I argue that it is wrong deliberately to bring into existence an individual whose life we can reasonably expect will be of very poor quality. The individual's life would on balance be worth living but would nevertheless fall below a certain threshold. Additionally the prospective parents are unable to have any other child who would enjoy a better existence. Against the claims of John Harris and John Robertson I argue that deliberately to conceive such a child would not be to exercise the right to procreate. For this right is internally constrained by the requirement that any resultant child has the reasonable prospect of a minimally decent life.

AB - I argue that it is wrong deliberately to bring into existence an individual whose life we can reasonably expect will be of very poor quality. The individual's life would on balance be worth living but would nevertheless fall below a certain threshold. Additionally the prospective parents are unable to have any other child who would enjoy a better existence. Against the claims of John Harris and John Robertson I argue that deliberately to conceive such a child would not be to exercise the right to procreate. For this right is internally constrained by the requirement that any resultant child has the reasonable prospect of a minimally decent life.

U2 - 10.1017/S0031819104000348

DO - 10.1017/S0031819104000348

M3 - Journal article

VL - 79

SP - 403

EP - 420

JO - Philosophy

JF - Philosophy

SN - 0031-8191

IS - 3

ER -