Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theo...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic

Research output: Working paperPreprint

Published

Standard

Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic. / Caminati, Marco B.
2009. (arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.2059).

Research output: Working paperPreprint

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Caminati MB. Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic. 2009 Oct 11. (arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.2059). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0910.2059

Author

Bibtex

@techreport{5a4e7e15ecd34abe8355bfb111cd668e,
title = "Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic",
abstract = "A Henkin-style proof of completeness of first-order classical logic is given with respect to a very small set (notably missing cut rule) of Genzten deduction rules for intuitionistic sequents. Insisting on sparing on derivation rules, satisfiability theorem is seen to need weaker assumptions than completeness theorem, the missing request being exactly the rule ~ p --> p, which gives a hint of intuitionism's motivations from a classical point of view. A bare treatment of standard, basic first-order syntax somehow more algebraic-flavoured than usual is also given.",
author = "Caminati, {Marco B}",
year = "2009",
month = oct,
day = "11",
doi = "10.48550/arXiv.0910.2059",
language = "English",
series = "arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.2059",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic

AU - Caminati, Marco B

PY - 2009/10/11

Y1 - 2009/10/11

N2 - A Henkin-style proof of completeness of first-order classical logic is given with respect to a very small set (notably missing cut rule) of Genzten deduction rules for intuitionistic sequents. Insisting on sparing on derivation rules, satisfiability theorem is seen to need weaker assumptions than completeness theorem, the missing request being exactly the rule ~ p --> p, which gives a hint of intuitionism's motivations from a classical point of view. A bare treatment of standard, basic first-order syntax somehow more algebraic-flavoured than usual is also given.

AB - A Henkin-style proof of completeness of first-order classical logic is given with respect to a very small set (notably missing cut rule) of Genzten deduction rules for intuitionistic sequents. Insisting on sparing on derivation rules, satisfiability theorem is seen to need weaker assumptions than completeness theorem, the missing request being exactly the rule ~ p --> p, which gives a hint of intuitionism's motivations from a classical point of view. A bare treatment of standard, basic first-order syntax somehow more algebraic-flavoured than usual is also given.

U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.0910.2059

DO - 10.48550/arXiv.0910.2059

M3 - Preprint

T3 - arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.2059

BT - Yet another proof of Goedel's completeness theorem for first-order classical logic

ER -