Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Youth Mobility Scheme

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • NIESR

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, National Institute Economic Review, 248 (1), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the National Institute Economic Review page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/NER on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 442 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement? / Consterdine, Erica.
In: National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 248, No. 1, 01.05.2019, p. R40-R48.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Consterdine, E 2019, 'Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?', National Institute Economic Review, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. R40-R48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011924800112

APA

Consterdine, E. (2019). Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement? National Institute Economic Review, 248(1), R40-R48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011924800112

Vancouver

Consterdine E. Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement? National Institute Economic Review. 2019 May 1;248(1):R40-R48. Epub 2019 Apr 24. doi: 10.1177/002795011924800112

Author

Consterdine, Erica. / Youth Mobility Scheme : The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?. In: National Institute Economic Review. 2019 ; Vol. 248, No. 1. pp. R40-R48.

Bibtex

@article{16ec3880d9564e18bceb2fa768386976,
title = "Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?",
abstract = "Free movement has been at the heart of the Brexit debate, with the government grappling between satisfying public and business demands for restrictive and liberal approaches to immigration respectively. In response the government have advocated temporary migration as a potential solution, including an expanded UK-EU Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) modelled on the current T5 YMS on the assumption that YMS migrants undertake low-skilled jobs. Little is known about this visa or the labour market activity of YMS migrants. Drawing on policy analysis alongside survey and interview data from Australian YMS migrants, this paper seeks to bridge some of these knowledge gaps, arguing that an expanded EU YMS will not attract significant EU migrants, and is far from a remedy for free movement ending.",
keywords = "Brexit, F22, J08, labour market, temporary immigration, UK immigration policy, youth mobility scheme",
author = "Erica Consterdine",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, National Institute Economic Review, 248 (1), 2019, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the National Institute Economic Review page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/NER on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/ ",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002795011924800112",
language = "English",
volume = "248",
pages = "R40--R48",
journal = "National Institute Economic Review",
issn = "0027-9501",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth Mobility Scheme

T2 - The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?

AU - Consterdine, Erica

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, National Institute Economic Review, 248 (1), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the National Institute Economic Review page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/NER on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Free movement has been at the heart of the Brexit debate, with the government grappling between satisfying public and business demands for restrictive and liberal approaches to immigration respectively. In response the government have advocated temporary migration as a potential solution, including an expanded UK-EU Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) modelled on the current T5 YMS on the assumption that YMS migrants undertake low-skilled jobs. Little is known about this visa or the labour market activity of YMS migrants. Drawing on policy analysis alongside survey and interview data from Australian YMS migrants, this paper seeks to bridge some of these knowledge gaps, arguing that an expanded EU YMS will not attract significant EU migrants, and is far from a remedy for free movement ending.

AB - Free movement has been at the heart of the Brexit debate, with the government grappling between satisfying public and business demands for restrictive and liberal approaches to immigration respectively. In response the government have advocated temporary migration as a potential solution, including an expanded UK-EU Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) modelled on the current T5 YMS on the assumption that YMS migrants undertake low-skilled jobs. Little is known about this visa or the labour market activity of YMS migrants. Drawing on policy analysis alongside survey and interview data from Australian YMS migrants, this paper seeks to bridge some of these knowledge gaps, arguing that an expanded EU YMS will not attract significant EU migrants, and is far from a remedy for free movement ending.

KW - Brexit

KW - F22

KW - J08

KW - labour market

KW - temporary immigration

KW - UK immigration policy

KW - youth mobility scheme

U2 - 10.1177/002795011924800112

DO - 10.1177/002795011924800112

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85064943662

VL - 248

SP - R40-R48

JO - National Institute Economic Review

JF - National Institute Economic Review

SN - 0027-9501

IS - 1

ER -