Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Of Ironies and Agency: Energy Professionals’ Vi...

Electronic data

  • Of_Ironies_and_Agency_Bremer_Knowles_Friday

    Proof, 532 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Of Ironies and Agency: Energy Professionals’ Views on Digital Interventions and Their Users

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date25/04/2025
Host publicationCHI '25: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
EditorsNaomi Yamashita, Vanessa Evers, Koji Yatani, Xianghua (Sharon) Ding, Bongshin Lee, Marshini Chetty, Phoebe Toups-Dugas
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherACM
Pages1-14
Number of pages14
ISBN (electronic)9798400713941
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventCHI 2025 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Yokohama, Japan
Duration: 26/04/20251/05/2025
http://chi2025.acm.org

Conference

ConferenceCHI 2025 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Abbreviated titleCHI 2025
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityYokohama
Period26/04/251/05/25
Internet address

Conference

ConferenceCHI 2025 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Abbreviated titleCHI 2025
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityYokohama
Period26/04/251/05/25
Internet address

Abstract

The efficacy of digital solutions to increase energy efficiency, including technical optimisations and behavioural influence, has long been a subject of debate within sustainable HCI (SHCI). While the viewpoints of policymakers and academics are frequently published (and often contradictory), less is known about the views of those on the ground. In this paper we ask: What are energy professionals’ views of digital energy-saving interventions and their users? What are the challenges they face implementing these interventions? Based on a university campus case study with twelve semi-structured interviews and a focus group with energy and facilities’ professionals, we illustrate how they strongly advocate digital efficiency as a pathway to sustainability; yet, this optimism is in apparent tension with key barriers they identify to realising ‘their seamless visions’, particularly the complexities of the human behaviour they are seeking to optimise. These findings underscore the seductiveness of techno-optimism and the need for more systemic change.