Proof, 532 KB, PDF document
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Of Ironies and Agency: Energy Professionals’ Views on Digital Interventions and Their Users
AU - Bremer, Christina
AU - Knowles, Bran
AU - Friday, Adrian
PY - 2025/4/25
Y1 - 2025/4/25
N2 - The efficacy of digital solutions to increase energy efficiency, including technical optimisations and behavioural influence, has long been a subject of debate within sustainable HCI (SHCI). While the viewpoints of policymakers and academics are frequently published (and often contradictory), less is known about the views of those on the ground. In this paper we ask: What are energy professionals’ views of digital energy-saving interventions and their users? What are the challenges they face implementing these interventions? Based on a university campus case study with twelve semi-structured interviews and a focus group with energy and facilities’ professionals, we illustrate how they strongly advocate digital efficiency as a pathway to sustainability; yet, this optimism is in apparent tension with key barriers they identify to realising ‘their seamless visions’, particularly the complexities of the human behaviour they are seeking to optimise. These findings underscore the seductiveness of techno-optimism and the need for more systemic change.
AB - The efficacy of digital solutions to increase energy efficiency, including technical optimisations and behavioural influence, has long been a subject of debate within sustainable HCI (SHCI). While the viewpoints of policymakers and academics are frequently published (and often contradictory), less is known about the views of those on the ground. In this paper we ask: What are energy professionals’ views of digital energy-saving interventions and their users? What are the challenges they face implementing these interventions? Based on a university campus case study with twelve semi-structured interviews and a focus group with energy and facilities’ professionals, we illustrate how they strongly advocate digital efficiency as a pathway to sustainability; yet, this optimism is in apparent tension with key barriers they identify to realising ‘their seamless visions’, particularly the complexities of the human behaviour they are seeking to optimise. These findings underscore the seductiveness of techno-optimism and the need for more systemic change.
U2 - 10.1145/3706598.3713754
DO - 10.1145/3706598.3713754
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SP - 1
EP - 14
BT - CHI '25: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A2 - Yamashita, Naomi
A2 - Evers, Vanessa
A2 - Yatani, Koji
A2 - Ding, Xianghua (Sharon)
A2 - Lee, Bongshin
A2 - Chetty, Marshini
A2 - Toups-Dugas, Phoebe
PB - ACM
CY - New York
T2 - CHI 2025 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Y2 - 26 April 2025 through 1 May 2025
ER -