Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the ...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model. / Woodfield, E. E.; Dunlop, M. W.; Holme, R. et al.
In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, No. A06248, 29.06.2007.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Woodfield, EE, Dunlop, MW, Holme, R, Davies, JA & Hapgood, MA 2007, 'A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model.', Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 112, no. A06248. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012217

APA

Woodfield, E. E., Dunlop, M. W., Holme, R., Davies, J. A., & Hapgood, M. A. (2007). A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(A06248). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012217

Vancouver

Woodfield EE, Dunlop MW, Holme R, Davies JA, Hapgood MA. A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2007 Jun 29;112(A06248). doi: 10.1029/2006JA012217

Author

Woodfield, E. E. ; Dunlop, M. W. ; Holme, R. et al. / A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model. In: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2007 ; Vol. 112, No. A06248.

Bibtex

@article{f54e44d3e22f436ba77ab07a88e6db0a,
title = "A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model.",
abstract = "As part of an investigation of the magnetic effects of external currents in the magnetosphere, we have compared two years of perigee Cluster data to the Tsyganenko 2001 (T01) field model. Cluster data are not included in the T01 database and therefore can be used to independently verify the model. The model performs very well in a global sense; nevertheless, absolute residuals between the data and the model can reach ~20 nT near perigee. These deviations take two forms: a sharp, bipolar signature and well-defined trends over a larger spatial region. The bipolar signatures in the residuals are moderately stable, repeating on the phase period of the Cluster orbit. The bipolar nature of the signatures reflects variations in the Cluster data, therefore indicating that the spacecraft may be observing a field-aligned current. Although the size of the magnetic field perturbation in this region is not well determined by T01, the location of the observed field-aligned current system is accurately predicted. The bipolar signatures are observed in close proximity to the edge of the ring current, estimated from Cluster energetic electron spectrograms, indicating that they are associated with region 2 field-aligned currents. Longer-duration trends in the residuals indicate a slight difference between the model predictions and the Cluster data for various locations and seasons. For example, throughout most of 2003 and the first half of 2004, there is a residual in the total magnetic field for an hour centered on perigee, of ~20 nT.",
keywords = "Cluster, Tsyganenko DCS-publications-id, art-921, DCS-publications-personnel-id, 140",
author = "Woodfield, {E. E.} and Dunlop, {M. W.} and R. Holme and Davies, {J. A.} and Hapgood, {M. A.}",
note = "Copyright (2007) American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted",
year = "2007",
month = jun,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1029/2006JA012217",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "A06248",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko 2001 model.

AU - Woodfield, E. E.

AU - Dunlop, M. W.

AU - Holme, R.

AU - Davies, J. A.

AU - Hapgood, M. A.

N1 - Copyright (2007) American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted

PY - 2007/6/29

Y1 - 2007/6/29

N2 - As part of an investigation of the magnetic effects of external currents in the magnetosphere, we have compared two years of perigee Cluster data to the Tsyganenko 2001 (T01) field model. Cluster data are not included in the T01 database and therefore can be used to independently verify the model. The model performs very well in a global sense; nevertheless, absolute residuals between the data and the model can reach ~20 nT near perigee. These deviations take two forms: a sharp, bipolar signature and well-defined trends over a larger spatial region. The bipolar signatures in the residuals are moderately stable, repeating on the phase period of the Cluster orbit. The bipolar nature of the signatures reflects variations in the Cluster data, therefore indicating that the spacecraft may be observing a field-aligned current. Although the size of the magnetic field perturbation in this region is not well determined by T01, the location of the observed field-aligned current system is accurately predicted. The bipolar signatures are observed in close proximity to the edge of the ring current, estimated from Cluster energetic electron spectrograms, indicating that they are associated with region 2 field-aligned currents. Longer-duration trends in the residuals indicate a slight difference between the model predictions and the Cluster data for various locations and seasons. For example, throughout most of 2003 and the first half of 2004, there is a residual in the total magnetic field for an hour centered on perigee, of ~20 nT.

AB - As part of an investigation of the magnetic effects of external currents in the magnetosphere, we have compared two years of perigee Cluster data to the Tsyganenko 2001 (T01) field model. Cluster data are not included in the T01 database and therefore can be used to independently verify the model. The model performs very well in a global sense; nevertheless, absolute residuals between the data and the model can reach ~20 nT near perigee. These deviations take two forms: a sharp, bipolar signature and well-defined trends over a larger spatial region. The bipolar signatures in the residuals are moderately stable, repeating on the phase period of the Cluster orbit. The bipolar nature of the signatures reflects variations in the Cluster data, therefore indicating that the spacecraft may be observing a field-aligned current. Although the size of the magnetic field perturbation in this region is not well determined by T01, the location of the observed field-aligned current system is accurately predicted. The bipolar signatures are observed in close proximity to the edge of the ring current, estimated from Cluster energetic electron spectrograms, indicating that they are associated with region 2 field-aligned currents. Longer-duration trends in the residuals indicate a slight difference between the model predictions and the Cluster data for various locations and seasons. For example, throughout most of 2003 and the first half of 2004, there is a residual in the total magnetic field for an hour centered on perigee, of ~20 nT.

KW - Cluster

KW - Tsyganenko DCS-publications-id

KW - art-921

KW - DCS-publications-personnel-id

KW - 140

U2 - 10.1029/2006JA012217

DO - 10.1029/2006JA012217

M3 - Journal article

VL - 112

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - A06248

ER -