Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality ...

Electronic data

  • ACTA_MA_submission_FINAL_VERSION_PURE

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Porter, C, Palmier‐Claus, J, Branitsky, A, Mansell, W, Warwick, H, Varese, F. (2019) Childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder: a meta‐analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. doi: 10.1111/acps.13118 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acps.13118 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 585 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 19/10/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/01/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Issue number1
Volume141
Number of pages15
Pages (from-to)6-20
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to better understand the magnitude and consistency of the association between childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder (BPD) across case-control, epidemiological and prospective cohort studies.
Method: Following the review protocol (reference: CRD42017075179), search terms pertaining to adversity and BPD, were entered into three search engines. Random effects meta-analysis synthesised the size and consistency of the effects.
Results: 97 studies compared BPD to non-clinical (k = 40) and clinical (k = 70) controls. Meta-analysis of case control studies indicated that individuals with BPD are 13.91 (95% CI 11.11-17.43) times more likely to report childhood adversity than non-clinical controls. This effect was smaller when considering retrospective cohort (OR: 2.59; 95% CI .93-7.30) and epidemiological (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.24-5.30) studies. Findings were significant across adversity subtypes with emotional abuse (OR: 38.11, 95% CI: 25.99-55.88) and neglect (OR: 17.73, 95% CI=13.01-24.17) demonstrating the largest effects. Individuals with BPD were 3.15 (95% CI 2.62-3.79) times more likely to report childhood adversity than other psychiatric groups.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis corroborates theoretical proposals that exposure to adverse life experiences is associated with BPD. It highlights the importance of considering childhood adversity when treating people diagnosed with BPD.

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Porter, C, Palmier‐Claus, J, Branitsky, A, Mansell, W, Warwick, H, Varese, F. (2019) Childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder: a meta‐analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. doi: 10.1111/acps.13118 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acps.13118 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.