Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparative study of large-scale auroral signat...

Electronic data

  • Walach_et_al-2017-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research-_Space_Physics

    Rights statement: ©2017. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Final published version, 2 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events. / Walach, M.-t.; Milan, S. E.; Murphy, K. R. et al.
In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 122, No. 6, 06.2017, p. 6357-6373.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Walach, M, Milan, SE, Murphy, KR, Carter, JA, Hubert, BA & Grocott, A 2017, 'Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events', Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 6357-6373. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023991

APA

Walach, M., Milan, S. E., Murphy, K. R., Carter, J. A., Hubert, B. A., & Grocott, A. (2017). Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 122(6), 6357-6373. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023991

Vancouver

Walach M, Milan SE, Murphy KR, Carter JA, Hubert BA, Grocott A. Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2017 Jun;122(6):6357-6373. Epub 2017 Jun 27. doi: 10.1002/2017JA023991

Author

Walach, M.-t. ; Milan, S. E. ; Murphy, K. R. et al. / Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2017 ; Vol. 122, No. 6. pp. 6357-6373.

Bibtex

@article{e5cee1e5f7134341bea7a9bf32eaba68,
title = "Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events",
abstract = "This paper investigates the auroral evolution during different magnetospheric modes: substorms, steady magnetospheric convection, and sawtooth events. We undertake a superposed epoch analysis using data from the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration Far Ultraviolet spectrographic imager and wideband imaging camera for each of these event types. We find that the auroral oval narrows and shows an equatorward movement prior to substorm onset. At substorm onset, the auroral oval brightens explosively near 23 magnetic local time (MLT). After this the aurorae expand poleward and the brightening stretches duskward and dawnward, with the duskward expansion being faster. Approximately 20 min after substorm onset, the aurorae begin to dim. Steady magnetospheric convection events with preceding substorms initially show the same signatures as substorms, but instead of the recovery after 20 min postonset, the aurorae stay bright for an extended period of time (at least 4 h after onset). Despite continued dayside driving of the system during steady magnetospheric convection events, we see a reconfiguration in the nightside auroral activity, taking place between 120 to 150 min after onset. Sawtooth events show very similar signatures to substorms, except for the auroral emission being much brighter, covering a wider MLT extent, and taking significantly less time to recover. The proton aurorae during substorms take ∼2–4 h to dim, during sawtooth events this process takes less than 1 h, despite enhanced reconnection rates. A similar effect is seen in the electron aurorae, albeit not as extreme.",
keywords = "magnetospheric modes, aurora, solar wind-magnetospheric coupling, substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, sawtooth events",
author = "M.-t. Walach and Milan, {S. E.} and Murphy, {K. R.} and Carter, {J. A.} and Hubert, {B. A.} and A. Grocott",
note = "{\textcopyright}2017. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1002/2017JA023991",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "6357--6373",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
issn = "2169-9402",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of large-scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events

AU - Walach, M.-t.

AU - Milan, S. E.

AU - Murphy, K. R.

AU - Carter, J. A.

AU - Hubert, B. A.

AU - Grocott, A.

N1 - ©2017. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This paper investigates the auroral evolution during different magnetospheric modes: substorms, steady magnetospheric convection, and sawtooth events. We undertake a superposed epoch analysis using data from the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration Far Ultraviolet spectrographic imager and wideband imaging camera for each of these event types. We find that the auroral oval narrows and shows an equatorward movement prior to substorm onset. At substorm onset, the auroral oval brightens explosively near 23 magnetic local time (MLT). After this the aurorae expand poleward and the brightening stretches duskward and dawnward, with the duskward expansion being faster. Approximately 20 min after substorm onset, the aurorae begin to dim. Steady magnetospheric convection events with preceding substorms initially show the same signatures as substorms, but instead of the recovery after 20 min postonset, the aurorae stay bright for an extended period of time (at least 4 h after onset). Despite continued dayside driving of the system during steady magnetospheric convection events, we see a reconfiguration in the nightside auroral activity, taking place between 120 to 150 min after onset. Sawtooth events show very similar signatures to substorms, except for the auroral emission being much brighter, covering a wider MLT extent, and taking significantly less time to recover. The proton aurorae during substorms take ∼2–4 h to dim, during sawtooth events this process takes less than 1 h, despite enhanced reconnection rates. A similar effect is seen in the electron aurorae, albeit not as extreme.

AB - This paper investigates the auroral evolution during different magnetospheric modes: substorms, steady magnetospheric convection, and sawtooth events. We undertake a superposed epoch analysis using data from the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration Far Ultraviolet spectrographic imager and wideband imaging camera for each of these event types. We find that the auroral oval narrows and shows an equatorward movement prior to substorm onset. At substorm onset, the auroral oval brightens explosively near 23 magnetic local time (MLT). After this the aurorae expand poleward and the brightening stretches duskward and dawnward, with the duskward expansion being faster. Approximately 20 min after substorm onset, the aurorae begin to dim. Steady magnetospheric convection events with preceding substorms initially show the same signatures as substorms, but instead of the recovery after 20 min postonset, the aurorae stay bright for an extended period of time (at least 4 h after onset). Despite continued dayside driving of the system during steady magnetospheric convection events, we see a reconfiguration in the nightside auroral activity, taking place between 120 to 150 min after onset. Sawtooth events show very similar signatures to substorms, except for the auroral emission being much brighter, covering a wider MLT extent, and taking significantly less time to recover. The proton aurorae during substorms take ∼2–4 h to dim, during sawtooth events this process takes less than 1 h, despite enhanced reconnection rates. A similar effect is seen in the electron aurorae, albeit not as extreme.

KW - magnetospheric modes

KW - aurora

KW - solar wind-magnetospheric coupling

KW - substorms

KW - steady magnetospheric convection events

KW - sawtooth events

U2 - 10.1002/2017JA023991

DO - 10.1002/2017JA023991

M3 - Journal article

VL - 122

SP - 6357

EP - 6373

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

SN - 2169-9402

IS - 6

ER -