Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Customer enquiry management and product customi...
View graph of relations

Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector. / Zorzini, M; Hendry, L; Stevenson, M et al.
In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 28, No. 12, 2008, p. 1186-1218.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Zorzini M, Hendry L, Stevenson M, Pozzetti A. Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2008;28(12):1186-1218. doi: 10.1108/01443570810919369

Author

Zorzini, M ; Hendry, L ; Stevenson, M et al. / Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector. In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2008 ; Vol. 28, No. 12. pp. 1186-1218.

Bibtex

@article{64df0c236ec344a9af6d58baa1f92bd2,
title = "Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector",
abstract = "Purpose – The customer enquiry management (CEM) process is of strategic importance in engineer-to-order contexts but existing literature does not adequately describe how firms support delivery date setting and order acceptance decisions in practice. This paper seeks to explore how and why the CEM process varies between companies in the capital goods sector, thereby taking a contingency theory approach.Design/methodology/approach – Multi-case study research involving 18 Italian capital goods manufacturers in four industrial sectors. Face-to-face interviews with senior representatives have been conducted. Companies have been grouped into five clusters, based on similarities in their CEM decision-making modes, to aid analysis.Findings – Three contingency factors were found to be particularly relevant in determining CEM modes: degree of product customization, flexibility of the production system, and uncertainty of the context. These factors affect the choice of specific CEM decision-making modes. However, a high level of cross-functional coordination and formalization of the process were found to constitute best practices whatever the contingency factors.Research limitations/implications – The research focuses on companies belonging to the Italian capital goods sector – findings may differ in other countries and sectors.Practical implications – The results indicate that all firms, including small and medium-sized companies, should implement high levels of cross-functional coordination and formalization in their CEM practices, in order to improve their performance. For other aspects of the CEM process, including supplier and subcontractor monitoring, the company context will indicate whether these aspects are required, according to a need of matching the approach to CEM with specific sets of contingency factors.Originality/value – This paper provides a rare insight into the CEM processes found in practice.",
keywords = "Customer service management, Customization , Delivery dates, Italy",
author = "M Zorzini and L Hendry and M Stevenson and A Pozzetti",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1108/01443570810919369",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1186--1218",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Customer enquiry management and product customization: an empirical multi-case study analysis in the Italian capital goods sector

AU - Zorzini, M

AU - Hendry, L

AU - Stevenson, M

AU - Pozzetti, A

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose – The customer enquiry management (CEM) process is of strategic importance in engineer-to-order contexts but existing literature does not adequately describe how firms support delivery date setting and order acceptance decisions in practice. This paper seeks to explore how and why the CEM process varies between companies in the capital goods sector, thereby taking a contingency theory approach.Design/methodology/approach – Multi-case study research involving 18 Italian capital goods manufacturers in four industrial sectors. Face-to-face interviews with senior representatives have been conducted. Companies have been grouped into five clusters, based on similarities in their CEM decision-making modes, to aid analysis.Findings – Three contingency factors were found to be particularly relevant in determining CEM modes: degree of product customization, flexibility of the production system, and uncertainty of the context. These factors affect the choice of specific CEM decision-making modes. However, a high level of cross-functional coordination and formalization of the process were found to constitute best practices whatever the contingency factors.Research limitations/implications – The research focuses on companies belonging to the Italian capital goods sector – findings may differ in other countries and sectors.Practical implications – The results indicate that all firms, including small and medium-sized companies, should implement high levels of cross-functional coordination and formalization in their CEM practices, in order to improve their performance. For other aspects of the CEM process, including supplier and subcontractor monitoring, the company context will indicate whether these aspects are required, according to a need of matching the approach to CEM with specific sets of contingency factors.Originality/value – This paper provides a rare insight into the CEM processes found in practice.

AB - Purpose – The customer enquiry management (CEM) process is of strategic importance in engineer-to-order contexts but existing literature does not adequately describe how firms support delivery date setting and order acceptance decisions in practice. This paper seeks to explore how and why the CEM process varies between companies in the capital goods sector, thereby taking a contingency theory approach.Design/methodology/approach – Multi-case study research involving 18 Italian capital goods manufacturers in four industrial sectors. Face-to-face interviews with senior representatives have been conducted. Companies have been grouped into five clusters, based on similarities in their CEM decision-making modes, to aid analysis.Findings – Three contingency factors were found to be particularly relevant in determining CEM modes: degree of product customization, flexibility of the production system, and uncertainty of the context. These factors affect the choice of specific CEM decision-making modes. However, a high level of cross-functional coordination and formalization of the process were found to constitute best practices whatever the contingency factors.Research limitations/implications – The research focuses on companies belonging to the Italian capital goods sector – findings may differ in other countries and sectors.Practical implications – The results indicate that all firms, including small and medium-sized companies, should implement high levels of cross-functional coordination and formalization in their CEM practices, in order to improve their performance. For other aspects of the CEM process, including supplier and subcontractor monitoring, the company context will indicate whether these aspects are required, according to a need of matching the approach to CEM with specific sets of contingency factors.Originality/value – This paper provides a rare insight into the CEM processes found in practice.

KW - Customer service management

KW - Customization

KW - Delivery dates

KW - Italy

U2 - 10.1108/01443570810919369

DO - 10.1108/01443570810919369

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 1186

EP - 1218

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 12

ER -