Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Institutional complexity and sustainable supply...

Electronic data

  • SCM IJ - Author Accepted Manuscript

    Rights statement: This article is (c)2017 Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Accepted author manuscript, 879 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices. / Sayed, Maysara; Hendry, Linda Caroline; Bell, Marta.

In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 22, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 542-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sayed, Maysara ; Hendry, Linda Caroline ; Bell, Marta. / Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices. In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 542-563.

Bibtex

@article{0668af259558461c89ed3ea6671aa833,
title = "Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices",
abstract = "Purpose: To empirically investigate the impact of: institutional pressures; institutional logics; and institutional complexity; on Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) practices across mixed public and private sector supply chains.Design/methodology/approach: Multi-case study data was collected from three tiers of food and catering supply chains: the customer/consumer tier; focal public sector UK Universities; and private sector suppliers / contractors. Findings: The findings indicate that: normative and mimetic pressures are more prevalent in focal Universities, compared to suppliers; there is typically no single dominant logic across these supply chains; and the multiplicity of institutional logics (e.g., sustainability logic versus financial logic) increases institutional complexity. Therefore, in the atypical case of homogeneity in terms of institutional pressures and logics, e.g. with a dominant sustainability logic throughout the supply chain, radical change in SSCM practices is facilitated. In contrast, in the more typical case when there is heterogeneity, with competing logics at different supply chain tiers, this limits SSCM to more incremental changes in practices. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to three tiers of the food and catering supply chains of UK Universities. Practical implications: To aid in the successful implementation of SSCM, this study suggests a need for managers to develop an initial understanding of the prevailing institutional logics and pressures at different tiers of the supply chain.Social implications: A number of the SSCM practices studied address social sustainability.Originality/value: No previous studies have empirically investigated the impact of institutional complexity in the context of SSCM practices across supply chains, involving both mixed public and private sector organisations.",
keywords = "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Institutional Theory, Institutional Pressures, Institutional Logics, Institutional Complexity, Multi-Case",
author = "Maysara Sayed and Hendry, {Linda Caroline} and Marta Bell",
note = "This article is (c)2017 Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1108/SCM-10-2016-0365",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "542--563",
journal = "Supply Chain Management: An International Journal",
issn = "1359-8546",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices

AU - Sayed, Maysara

AU - Hendry, Linda Caroline

AU - Bell, Marta

N1 - This article is (c)2017 Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Purpose: To empirically investigate the impact of: institutional pressures; institutional logics; and institutional complexity; on Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) practices across mixed public and private sector supply chains.Design/methodology/approach: Multi-case study data was collected from three tiers of food and catering supply chains: the customer/consumer tier; focal public sector UK Universities; and private sector suppliers / contractors. Findings: The findings indicate that: normative and mimetic pressures are more prevalent in focal Universities, compared to suppliers; there is typically no single dominant logic across these supply chains; and the multiplicity of institutional logics (e.g., sustainability logic versus financial logic) increases institutional complexity. Therefore, in the atypical case of homogeneity in terms of institutional pressures and logics, e.g. with a dominant sustainability logic throughout the supply chain, radical change in SSCM practices is facilitated. In contrast, in the more typical case when there is heterogeneity, with competing logics at different supply chain tiers, this limits SSCM to more incremental changes in practices. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to three tiers of the food and catering supply chains of UK Universities. Practical implications: To aid in the successful implementation of SSCM, this study suggests a need for managers to develop an initial understanding of the prevailing institutional logics and pressures at different tiers of the supply chain.Social implications: A number of the SSCM practices studied address social sustainability.Originality/value: No previous studies have empirically investigated the impact of institutional complexity in the context of SSCM practices across supply chains, involving both mixed public and private sector organisations.

AB - Purpose: To empirically investigate the impact of: institutional pressures; institutional logics; and institutional complexity; on Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) practices across mixed public and private sector supply chains.Design/methodology/approach: Multi-case study data was collected from three tiers of food and catering supply chains: the customer/consumer tier; focal public sector UK Universities; and private sector suppliers / contractors. Findings: The findings indicate that: normative and mimetic pressures are more prevalent in focal Universities, compared to suppliers; there is typically no single dominant logic across these supply chains; and the multiplicity of institutional logics (e.g., sustainability logic versus financial logic) increases institutional complexity. Therefore, in the atypical case of homogeneity in terms of institutional pressures and logics, e.g. with a dominant sustainability logic throughout the supply chain, radical change in SSCM practices is facilitated. In contrast, in the more typical case when there is heterogeneity, with competing logics at different supply chain tiers, this limits SSCM to more incremental changes in practices. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to three tiers of the food and catering supply chains of UK Universities. Practical implications: To aid in the successful implementation of SSCM, this study suggests a need for managers to develop an initial understanding of the prevailing institutional logics and pressures at different tiers of the supply chain.Social implications: A number of the SSCM practices studied address social sustainability.Originality/value: No previous studies have empirically investigated the impact of institutional complexity in the context of SSCM practices across supply chains, involving both mixed public and private sector organisations.

KW - Sustainable Supply Chain Management

KW - Institutional Theory

KW - Institutional Pressures

KW - Institutional Logics

KW - Institutional Complexity

KW - Multi-Case

U2 - 10.1108/SCM-10-2016-0365

DO - 10.1108/SCM-10-2016-0365

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 542

EP - 563

JO - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

JF - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

SN - 1359-8546

IS - 6

ER -