Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journalof Production Research on 19/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2017.1281462
Accepted author manuscript, 745 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts
T2 - an assessment by simulation
AU - Thurer, Matthias
AU - Fernandes, Nuno Octavio
AU - Stevenson, Mark
AU - Qu, Ting
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journalof Production Research on 19/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2017.1281462
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Constant Work-in-Process (ConWIP) is a card-based control system that was developed for simple flow shops – a lack of load-balancing capabilities hinders its application to more complex shops. In contrast, load balancing is an integral part of Workload Control, a production planning and control concept developed for high-variety environments. One means of load balancing evident in the Workload Control literature is through the use of a capacity slack-based backlog-sequencing rule. This study therefore investigates the potential of the backlog-sequencing decision to improve load balancing in the context of ConWIP, thereby making it suitable for more complex, high-variety environments. Using simulation, we demonstrate that: (i) the choice of backlog-sequencing rule significantly impacts throughput times and tardiness-related performance measures; and (ii) capacity slack-based sequencing rules achieve significant performance improvements over ‘classical’ ConWIP backlog-sequencing rules. These results significantly extend the applicability of ConWIP. Results from the Workload Control literature however do not directly translate across to ConWIP. The simplified release procedure of ConWIP makes backlog-sequencing based on planned release dates dysfunctional. This negatively impacts the performance of modified capacity slack-based sequencing rules that were recently shown to be the best choice for Workload Control.
AB - Constant Work-in-Process (ConWIP) is a card-based control system that was developed for simple flow shops – a lack of load-balancing capabilities hinders its application to more complex shops. In contrast, load balancing is an integral part of Workload Control, a production planning and control concept developed for high-variety environments. One means of load balancing evident in the Workload Control literature is through the use of a capacity slack-based backlog-sequencing rule. This study therefore investigates the potential of the backlog-sequencing decision to improve load balancing in the context of ConWIP, thereby making it suitable for more complex, high-variety environments. Using simulation, we demonstrate that: (i) the choice of backlog-sequencing rule significantly impacts throughput times and tardiness-related performance measures; and (ii) capacity slack-based sequencing rules achieve significant performance improvements over ‘classical’ ConWIP backlog-sequencing rules. These results significantly extend the applicability of ConWIP. Results from the Workload Control literature however do not directly translate across to ConWIP. The simplified release procedure of ConWIP makes backlog-sequencing based on planned release dates dysfunctional. This negatively impacts the performance of modified capacity slack-based sequencing rules that were recently shown to be the best choice for Workload Control.
KW - Constant Work-in-Process (ConWIP)
KW - make-to-order (MTO) production
KW - dispatching
KW - Workload Control
KW - backlog-sequencing rule
U2 - 10.1080/00207543.2017.1281462
DO - 10.1080/00207543.2017.1281462
M3 - Journal article
VL - 55
SP - 4695
EP - 4711
JO - International Journal of Production Research
JF - International Journal of Production Research
SN - 0020-7543
IS - 16
ER -