12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Principles of dose finding studies in cancer
View graph of relations

« Back

Principles of dose finding studies in cancer: a comparison of trial designs

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date05/2013
JournalCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Journal number5
Volume71
Number of pages8
Pages1107-1114
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Purpose
One key aim of Phase I cancer studies is to identify the dose of a treatment to be further evaluated in Phase II. We describe, in non-statistical language, three classes of dose-escalation trial design and compare their properties.
Methods
We review three classes of dose-escalation design suitable for Phase I cancer trials: algorithmic approaches (including the popular 3 + 3 design), Bayesian model-based designs and Bayesian curve-free methods. We describe an example from each class and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the design classes.
Results
The main benefit of algorithmic approaches is the simplicity with which they may be communicated: it may be for this reason alone that they are still employed in the vast majority of Phase I trials. Model-based and curve-free Bayesian approaches are preferable to algorithmic methods due to their superior ability to identify the dose with the desired toxicity rate and their allocation of a greater proportion of patients to doses at, or close to, that dose.
Conclusions
For statistical and practical reasons, algorithmic methods cannot be recommended. The choice between a Bayesian model-based or curve-free approach depends on the previous information available about the compound under investigation. If this provides assurance about a particular model form, the model-based approach would be appropriate; if not, the curve-free method would be preferable.