Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for...
View graph of relations

A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies: incorporating later cycles of therapy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies: incorporating later cycles of therapy. / Sinclair, Karen; Whitehead, Anne.
In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 15, 10.07.2014, p. 2665-2680.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sinclair K, Whitehead A. A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies: incorporating later cycles of therapy. Statistics in Medicine. 2014 Jul 10;33(15):2665-2680. doi: 10.1002/sim.6132

Author

Sinclair, Karen ; Whitehead, Anne. / A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies : incorporating later cycles of therapy. In: Statistics in Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 15. pp. 2665-2680.

Bibtex

@article{611e275828d34540bc5c565c62e4a9d1,
title = "A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies: incorporating later cycles of therapy",
abstract = "We consider Phase I dose-finding studies for cytotoxic drugs in cancer, where the objective is identification of a target dose (TD100δ) associated with the probability δ of a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Previous authors have presented a design utilising a Bayesian decision procedure based on a logistic regression model to describe the relationship between dose and the risk of a DLT (LRDP). A cautious prior, chosen to ensure that the first cohort of patients are given the lowest dose, is combined with binary observations of DLTs to update model parameters and choose a safe dose for the next cohort. This process continues with each new cohort of patients. Typically, only DLTs occurring in the first treatment cycle are included.To incorporate data from later cycles, a new Bayesian decision procedure based on an interval-censored survival model (ICSDP) has been developed. This models the probability that the first DLT occurs in each specific cycle via the probability of a DLT during a specific cycle, conditional on having no DLT in any previous cycle. The second cohort of patients start after responses have been obtained from the first cycle of the first cohort, and subsequently dose selection for each new cohort is based on DLTs observed across all completed cycles for all patients. A simulation study comparing the ICSDP and LRDP showed that the ICSDP induces faster updating of the current estimate of the target dose, leading to shorter trials and fewer patients, whilst keeping the same level of accuracy. ",
keywords = "cancer trial, decision procedure, dose-finding, interval-censored, survival ",
author = "Karen Sinclair and Anne Whitehead",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1002/sim.6132",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2665--2680",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "15",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Bayesian approach to dose finding studies for cancer therapies

T2 - incorporating later cycles of therapy

AU - Sinclair, Karen

AU - Whitehead, Anne

PY - 2014/7/10

Y1 - 2014/7/10

N2 - We consider Phase I dose-finding studies for cytotoxic drugs in cancer, where the objective is identification of a target dose (TD100δ) associated with the probability δ of a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Previous authors have presented a design utilising a Bayesian decision procedure based on a logistic regression model to describe the relationship between dose and the risk of a DLT (LRDP). A cautious prior, chosen to ensure that the first cohort of patients are given the lowest dose, is combined with binary observations of DLTs to update model parameters and choose a safe dose for the next cohort. This process continues with each new cohort of patients. Typically, only DLTs occurring in the first treatment cycle are included.To incorporate data from later cycles, a new Bayesian decision procedure based on an interval-censored survival model (ICSDP) has been developed. This models the probability that the first DLT occurs in each specific cycle via the probability of a DLT during a specific cycle, conditional on having no DLT in any previous cycle. The second cohort of patients start after responses have been obtained from the first cycle of the first cohort, and subsequently dose selection for each new cohort is based on DLTs observed across all completed cycles for all patients. A simulation study comparing the ICSDP and LRDP showed that the ICSDP induces faster updating of the current estimate of the target dose, leading to shorter trials and fewer patients, whilst keeping the same level of accuracy.

AB - We consider Phase I dose-finding studies for cytotoxic drugs in cancer, where the objective is identification of a target dose (TD100δ) associated with the probability δ of a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Previous authors have presented a design utilising a Bayesian decision procedure based on a logistic regression model to describe the relationship between dose and the risk of a DLT (LRDP). A cautious prior, chosen to ensure that the first cohort of patients are given the lowest dose, is combined with binary observations of DLTs to update model parameters and choose a safe dose for the next cohort. This process continues with each new cohort of patients. Typically, only DLTs occurring in the first treatment cycle are included.To incorporate data from later cycles, a new Bayesian decision procedure based on an interval-censored survival model (ICSDP) has been developed. This models the probability that the first DLT occurs in each specific cycle via the probability of a DLT during a specific cycle, conditional on having no DLT in any previous cycle. The second cohort of patients start after responses have been obtained from the first cycle of the first cohort, and subsequently dose selection for each new cohort is based on DLTs observed across all completed cycles for all patients. A simulation study comparing the ICSDP and LRDP showed that the ICSDP induces faster updating of the current estimate of the target dose, leading to shorter trials and fewer patients, whilst keeping the same level of accuracy.

KW - cancer trial

KW - decision procedure

KW - dose-finding

KW - interval-censored

KW - survival

U2 - 10.1002/sim.6132

DO - 10.1002/sim.6132

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 2665

EP - 2680

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 15

ER -