Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison between parametric and non-paramet...
View graph of relations

A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns. / Diggle, Peter J.; Mateu, J.; Clough, H. E.
In: Advances in Applied Probability, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2000, p. 331-343.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Diggle PJ, Mateu J, Clough HE. A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns. Advances in Applied Probability. 2000;32(2):331-343. doi: 10.1239/aap/1013540166

Author

Diggle, Peter J. ; Mateu, J. ; Clough, H. E. / A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns. In: Advances in Applied Probability. 2000 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 331-343.

Bibtex

@article{f3461cab46514fba92d969683dbdd160,
title = "A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns.",
abstract = "The paper compares non-parametric (design-based) and parametric (model-based) approaches to the analysis of data in the form of replicated spatial point patterns in two or more experimental groups. Basic questions for data of this kind concern estimating the properties of the underlying spatial point process within each experimental group, and comparing the properties between groups. A non-parametric approach, building on work by Diggle et. al. (1991), summarizes each pattern by an estimate of the reduced second moment measure or K-function (Ripley (1977)) and compares mean K-functions between experimental groups using a bootstrap testing procedure. A parametric approach fits particular classes of parametric model to the data, uses the model parameter estimates as summaries and tests for differences between groups by comparing fits with and without the assumption of common parameter values across groups. The paper discusses how either approach can be implemented in the specific context of a single-factor replicated experiment and uses simulations to show how the parametric approach can be more efficient when the underlying model assumptions hold, but potentially misleading otherwise.",
keywords = "Expected significance levels, K-function, pseudo-likelihood function, replicated spatial point patterns, spatial analysis of variance",
author = "Diggle, {Peter J.} and J. Mateu and Clough, {H. E.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1239/aap/1013540166",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "331--343",
journal = "Advances in Applied Probability",
issn = "1475-6064",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns.

AU - Diggle, Peter J.

AU - Mateu, J.

AU - Clough, H. E.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The paper compares non-parametric (design-based) and parametric (model-based) approaches to the analysis of data in the form of replicated spatial point patterns in two or more experimental groups. Basic questions for data of this kind concern estimating the properties of the underlying spatial point process within each experimental group, and comparing the properties between groups. A non-parametric approach, building on work by Diggle et. al. (1991), summarizes each pattern by an estimate of the reduced second moment measure or K-function (Ripley (1977)) and compares mean K-functions between experimental groups using a bootstrap testing procedure. A parametric approach fits particular classes of parametric model to the data, uses the model parameter estimates as summaries and tests for differences between groups by comparing fits with and without the assumption of common parameter values across groups. The paper discusses how either approach can be implemented in the specific context of a single-factor replicated experiment and uses simulations to show how the parametric approach can be more efficient when the underlying model assumptions hold, but potentially misleading otherwise.

AB - The paper compares non-parametric (design-based) and parametric (model-based) approaches to the analysis of data in the form of replicated spatial point patterns in two or more experimental groups. Basic questions for data of this kind concern estimating the properties of the underlying spatial point process within each experimental group, and comparing the properties between groups. A non-parametric approach, building on work by Diggle et. al. (1991), summarizes each pattern by an estimate of the reduced second moment measure or K-function (Ripley (1977)) and compares mean K-functions between experimental groups using a bootstrap testing procedure. A parametric approach fits particular classes of parametric model to the data, uses the model parameter estimates as summaries and tests for differences between groups by comparing fits with and without the assumption of common parameter values across groups. The paper discusses how either approach can be implemented in the specific context of a single-factor replicated experiment and uses simulations to show how the parametric approach can be more efficient when the underlying model assumptions hold, but potentially misleading otherwise.

KW - Expected significance levels

KW - K-function

KW - pseudo-likelihood function

KW - replicated spatial point patterns

KW - spatial analysis of variance

U2 - 10.1239/aap/1013540166

DO - 10.1239/aap/1013540166

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 331

EP - 343

JO - Advances in Applied Probability

JF - Advances in Applied Probability

SN - 1475-6064

IS - 2

ER -