Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A framework for quantifying the multisectoral b...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making. / Lysholm, Sara; Chaters, Gemma L.; Di Bari, Carlotta et al.
In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol. 12, 1476505, 23.01.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lysholm, S, Chaters, GL, Di Bari, C, Hughes, EC, Huntington, B, Rushton, J & Thomas, L 2025, 'A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making', Frontiers in Veterinary Science, vol. 12, 1476505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505

APA

Lysholm, S., Chaters, G. L., Di Bari, C., Hughes, E. C., Huntington, B., Rushton, J., & Thomas, L. (2025). A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, Article 1476505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505

Vancouver

Lysholm S, Chaters GL, Di Bari C, Hughes EC, Huntington B, Rushton J et al. A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025 Jan 23;12:1476505. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505

Author

Lysholm, Sara ; Chaters, Gemma L. ; Di Bari, Carlotta et al. / A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making. In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025 ; Vol. 12.

Bibtex

@article{3799977b3a34487ca0523330e8b5c142,
title = "A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making",
abstract = "Animal diseases have wide-ranging impacts in multiple societal arenas, including agriculture, public health and the environment. These diseases cause significant economic losses for farmers, disrupt food security and present zoonotic risks to human populations. Additionally, they contribute to antimicrobial resistance and a range of environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions. The societal and ecological costs of livestock diseases are frequently underrepresented or unaddressed in policy decisions and resource allocations. Social cost–benefit analysis (SCBA) offers a comprehensive framework to evaluate the broad impacts of animal diseases across different sectors. This approach aligns with the One Health concept, which seeks to integrate and optimize the health of humans, animals and the environment. Traditional economic evaluations often focus narrowly on profit maximization within the livestock sector, neglecting wider externalities such as public health and environmental impacts. In contrast, SCBA takes a multi-sectoral whole-system view, considering multiple factors to guide public and private sector investments toward maximizing societal benefits. This paper discusses three separate sector specific (Animal health, Human health, Environmental health) methodologies for quantifying the burden of animal diseases. It then discusses how these estimates can be combined to generate multisectoral estimates of the impacts of animal diseases on human societies and the environment using monetary values. Finally this paper explores how this framework can support the evaluation of interventions from a One Health perspective though SCBA. This integrated assessment framework supports informed decision-making and resource allocation, ultimately contributing to improved public health outcomes, enhanced animal welfare, and greater environmental sustainability.",
keywords = "public health, animal health, global burden of animal diseases programme, environmental health, One Health, disease burden",
author = "Sara Lysholm and Chaters, {Gemma L.} and {Di Bari}, Carlotta and Hughes, {Ellen C.} and Ben Huntington and Jonathan Rushton and Lian Thomas",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
day = "23",
doi = "10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Frontiers in Veterinary Science",
issn = "2297-1769",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making

AU - Lysholm, Sara

AU - Chaters, Gemma L.

AU - Di Bari, Carlotta

AU - Hughes, Ellen C.

AU - Huntington, Ben

AU - Rushton, Jonathan

AU - Thomas, Lian

PY - 2025/1/23

Y1 - 2025/1/23

N2 - Animal diseases have wide-ranging impacts in multiple societal arenas, including agriculture, public health and the environment. These diseases cause significant economic losses for farmers, disrupt food security and present zoonotic risks to human populations. Additionally, they contribute to antimicrobial resistance and a range of environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions. The societal and ecological costs of livestock diseases are frequently underrepresented or unaddressed in policy decisions and resource allocations. Social cost–benefit analysis (SCBA) offers a comprehensive framework to evaluate the broad impacts of animal diseases across different sectors. This approach aligns with the One Health concept, which seeks to integrate and optimize the health of humans, animals and the environment. Traditional economic evaluations often focus narrowly on profit maximization within the livestock sector, neglecting wider externalities such as public health and environmental impacts. In contrast, SCBA takes a multi-sectoral whole-system view, considering multiple factors to guide public and private sector investments toward maximizing societal benefits. This paper discusses three separate sector specific (Animal health, Human health, Environmental health) methodologies for quantifying the burden of animal diseases. It then discusses how these estimates can be combined to generate multisectoral estimates of the impacts of animal diseases on human societies and the environment using monetary values. Finally this paper explores how this framework can support the evaluation of interventions from a One Health perspective though SCBA. This integrated assessment framework supports informed decision-making and resource allocation, ultimately contributing to improved public health outcomes, enhanced animal welfare, and greater environmental sustainability.

AB - Animal diseases have wide-ranging impacts in multiple societal arenas, including agriculture, public health and the environment. These diseases cause significant economic losses for farmers, disrupt food security and present zoonotic risks to human populations. Additionally, they contribute to antimicrobial resistance and a range of environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions. The societal and ecological costs of livestock diseases are frequently underrepresented or unaddressed in policy decisions and resource allocations. Social cost–benefit analysis (SCBA) offers a comprehensive framework to evaluate the broad impacts of animal diseases across different sectors. This approach aligns with the One Health concept, which seeks to integrate and optimize the health of humans, animals and the environment. Traditional economic evaluations often focus narrowly on profit maximization within the livestock sector, neglecting wider externalities such as public health and environmental impacts. In contrast, SCBA takes a multi-sectoral whole-system view, considering multiple factors to guide public and private sector investments toward maximizing societal benefits. This paper discusses three separate sector specific (Animal health, Human health, Environmental health) methodologies for quantifying the burden of animal diseases. It then discusses how these estimates can be combined to generate multisectoral estimates of the impacts of animal diseases on human societies and the environment using monetary values. Finally this paper explores how this framework can support the evaluation of interventions from a One Health perspective though SCBA. This integrated assessment framework supports informed decision-making and resource allocation, ultimately contributing to improved public health outcomes, enhanced animal welfare, and greater environmental sustainability.

KW - public health

KW - animal health

KW - global burden of animal diseases programme

KW - environmental health

KW - One Health

KW - disease burden

U2 - 10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505

DO - 10.3389/fvets.2025.1476505

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

JF - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

SN - 2297-1769

M1 - 1476505

ER -