Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A guide to good practice in modeling semantics ...

Electronic data

  • wrcr20393

    Rights statement: ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

    Final published version, 84.1 KB, PDF document


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A guide to good practice in modeling semantics for authors and referees

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>08/2013
<mark>Journal</mark>Water Resources Research
Issue number8
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)5092-5098
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This opinion piece makes some suggestions about guidelines for modeling semantics that can be referred to by authors and referees. We discuss descriptions of model structures, different forms of simulation and prediction, descriptions of different sources of uncertainty in modeling practice, the language of model validation, and concepts of predictability and fitness-for-purpose. While not expecting universal agreement on these suggestions, given the loose usage of words in the literature, we hope that the discussion of the issues involved will at least give pause for thought and encourage good practice in model development and applications.

Key Points

Semantics of hydrological modelling lack clarity Clarifications for simulation and forecasting and treatment of uncertainty Clarifications for model evaluation and falsification

Bibliographic note

©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.