Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A Penny for your Thoughts

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_27_10_23_1_

    Accepted author manuscript, 309 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A Penny for your Thoughts: Athletes’ and Trainee Sport Psychologists’ Internal Dialogue during Consultations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A Penny for your Thoughts: Athletes’ and Trainee Sport Psychologists’ Internal Dialogue during Consultations. / Tod, David; McEwan, Hayley; Whitehead, Amy et al.
In: The Sport Psychologist, Vol. 38, No. 1, 31.03.2024, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tod D, McEwan H, Whitehead A, Marchant D. A Penny for your Thoughts: Athletes’ and Trainee Sport Psychologists’ Internal Dialogue during Consultations. The Sport Psychologist. 2024 Mar 31;38(1):70-78. Epub 2024 Jan 19. doi: 10.1123/tsp.2023-0045

Author

Tod, David ; McEwan, Hayley ; Whitehead, Amy et al. / A Penny for your Thoughts : Athletes’ and Trainee Sport Psychologists’ Internal Dialogue during Consultations. In: The Sport Psychologist. 2024 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 70-78.

Bibtex

@article{60dc9216be56494c990a87c6c22f2ae7,
title = "A Penny for your Thoughts: Athletes{\textquoteright} and Trainee Sport Psychologists{\textquoteright} Internal Dialogue during Consultations",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to explore the internal dialogue of trainee sport psychologists (TSPs) and athletes immediately following athlete–practitioner consultations. TSPs (four male and three female, age 22–32 years) and athletes (four male, three female, age 19–29 years) completed a thought-listing procedure twice, while watching video recordings of their previous consultations. The thought-listing procedure involved participants{\textquoteright} pausing the video to record the in-session internal dialogue they had experienced during the consultation. Participants{\textquoteright} responses were categorized into six dimensions: time, place, focus, locus, orientation, and mode. TSPs{\textquoteright} and athletes{\textquoteright} retrospective accounts provided evidence that their in-session internal dialogue was (a) present focused, (b) about in-session material, (c) about the athletes or themselves, (d) about internal and external events, (e) professional (i.e., related to the session), and (f) neutral. Findings provide trainees and inexperienced practitioners with insights into the thought content of TSPs and athletes to guide their own athlete interactions.",
author = "David Tod and Hayley McEwan and Amy Whitehead and Daryl Marchant",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1123/tsp.2023-0045",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "The Sport Psychologist",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Penny for your Thoughts

T2 - Athletes’ and Trainee Sport Psychologists’ Internal Dialogue during Consultations

AU - Tod, David

AU - McEwan, Hayley

AU - Whitehead, Amy

AU - Marchant, Daryl

PY - 2024/3/31

Y1 - 2024/3/31

N2 - The purpose of this study was to explore the internal dialogue of trainee sport psychologists (TSPs) and athletes immediately following athlete–practitioner consultations. TSPs (four male and three female, age 22–32 years) and athletes (four male, three female, age 19–29 years) completed a thought-listing procedure twice, while watching video recordings of their previous consultations. The thought-listing procedure involved participants’ pausing the video to record the in-session internal dialogue they had experienced during the consultation. Participants’ responses were categorized into six dimensions: time, place, focus, locus, orientation, and mode. TSPs’ and athletes’ retrospective accounts provided evidence that their in-session internal dialogue was (a) present focused, (b) about in-session material, (c) about the athletes or themselves, (d) about internal and external events, (e) professional (i.e., related to the session), and (f) neutral. Findings provide trainees and inexperienced practitioners with insights into the thought content of TSPs and athletes to guide their own athlete interactions.

AB - The purpose of this study was to explore the internal dialogue of trainee sport psychologists (TSPs) and athletes immediately following athlete–practitioner consultations. TSPs (four male and three female, age 22–32 years) and athletes (four male, three female, age 19–29 years) completed a thought-listing procedure twice, while watching video recordings of their previous consultations. The thought-listing procedure involved participants’ pausing the video to record the in-session internal dialogue they had experienced during the consultation. Participants’ responses were categorized into six dimensions: time, place, focus, locus, orientation, and mode. TSPs’ and athletes’ retrospective accounts provided evidence that their in-session internal dialogue was (a) present focused, (b) about in-session material, (c) about the athletes or themselves, (d) about internal and external events, (e) professional (i.e., related to the session), and (f) neutral. Findings provide trainees and inexperienced practitioners with insights into the thought content of TSPs and athletes to guide their own athlete interactions.

U2 - 10.1123/tsp.2023-0045

DO - 10.1123/tsp.2023-0045

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - The Sport Psychologist

JF - The Sport Psychologist

IS - 1

ER -