Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A question of faith?

Electronic data

  • A Question of Faith AAM

    Rights statement: This material was first published by Thomson Reuters in Iganski, P., Sweiry, A. and Culpeper, J., A question of Faith? Prosecuting Religiously Aggravated Offences in England and Wales, Criminal Law Review, 2016, Issue 5, pp. 334-348, and is reproduced by agreement with the Publishers

    Accepted author manuscript, 323 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

  • A question of Faith 2016

    Rights statement: This material was first published by Thomson Reuters in Iganski, P., Sweiry, A. and Culpeper, J., A Question of Faith? Prosecuting Religiously Aggravated Offences in England and Wales, Criminal Law Review, 2016, Issue 5, pp. 334-348, and is reproduced by agreement with the Publishers

    Final published version, 295 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

A question of faith?: prosecuting religiously aggravated offences in England and Wales

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A question of faith? prosecuting religiously aggravated offences in England and Wales. / Iganski, Paul Stephen; Sweiry, Abraham Benjamin; Culpeper, Jonathan Vaughan.
In: Criminal Law Review, Vol. 2016, No. 5, 04.2016, p. 334-348.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{719cecf9d11a407cb50dee5ed138c2ee,
title = "A question of faith?: prosecuting religiously aggravated offences in England and Wales",
abstract = "Have some of the prosecutions for religiously aggravated offences going before the courts amounted to attempts to apply unjust prohibitions against freedom of speech? Is there any evidence that the provisions for religiously aggravated offences have been applied to suppress criticism of religion? This paper applies an analysis of Crown Prosecution Service records on religiously aggravated offences to address these questions.",
keywords = "Freedom of expression, Prosecutions, Religiously aggravated offences",
author = "Iganski, {Paul Stephen} and Sweiry, {Abraham Benjamin} and Culpeper, {Jonathan Vaughan}",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
pages = "334--348",
journal = "Criminal Law Review",
issn = "0011-135X",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A question of faith?

T2 - prosecuting religiously aggravated offences in England and Wales

AU - Iganski, Paul Stephen

AU - Sweiry, Abraham Benjamin

AU - Culpeper, Jonathan Vaughan

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - Have some of the prosecutions for religiously aggravated offences going before the courts amounted to attempts to apply unjust prohibitions against freedom of speech? Is there any evidence that the provisions for religiously aggravated offences have been applied to suppress criticism of religion? This paper applies an analysis of Crown Prosecution Service records on religiously aggravated offences to address these questions.

AB - Have some of the prosecutions for religiously aggravated offences going before the courts amounted to attempts to apply unjust prohibitions against freedom of speech? Is there any evidence that the provisions for religiously aggravated offences have been applied to suppress criticism of religion? This paper applies an analysis of Crown Prosecution Service records on religiously aggravated offences to address these questions.

KW - Freedom of expression

KW - Prosecutions

KW - Religiously aggravated offences

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2016

SP - 334

EP - 348

JO - Criminal Law Review

JF - Criminal Law Review

SN - 0011-135X

IS - 5

ER -