Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A Smart Approach?

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

View graph of relations

A Smart Approach?: Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Other › peer-review

Published

Standard

A Smart Approach? Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace. / Bremer, Christina.
2021. Automation Experience at the Workplace.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Other › peer-review

Harvard

Bremer, C 2021, 'A Smart Approach? Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace', Automation Experience at the Workplace, 7/05/21.

APA

Bremer, C. (2021). A Smart Approach? Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace. Automation Experience at the Workplace.

Vancouver

Bremer C. A Smart Approach? Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace. 2021. Automation Experience at the Workplace.

Author

Bremer, Christina. / A Smart Approach? Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace. Automation Experience at the Workplace.

Bibtex

@conference{21e876f8646141399ea4fe9a4e209d7d,
title = "A Smart Approach?: Raising Uncomfortable Questions about Building Automation in the Workplace",
abstract = "Building automation in the workplace is argued to open the door to a more energy-efficient and, thus, more sustainable future. The need for human interaction is replaced with automatic control and allowing algorithms to make autonomous decisions for the buildings{\textquoteright} energy systems, like heating, lighting and air conditioning. However, automation takes away the occupants{\textquoteright} agency leading to unexpected rebound effects, and may itself require energy-consuming elaborate algorithms, new sensors, data storage and computational infrastructure. I ask, is office building automation really a viable approach for the people and the planet? Or is the rhetoric of automation helping us turn a blind eye to the fact that we should invest our energy fundamentally differently? In this position paper I raise questions about the social and environmental sustainability of office building automation and the power of those who are made uncomfortable so we can all feel a little bit better about ourselves.",
author = "Christina Bremer",
year = "2021",
month = may,
day = "7",
language = "English",
note = "Automation Experience at the Workplace : Workshop at CHI'21 ; Conference date: 07-05-2021",
url = "https://matthiasbaldauf.com/automationxp21/",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - A Smart Approach?

T2 - Automation Experience at the Workplace

AU - Bremer, Christina

N1 - Conference code: CHI 2021

PY - 2021/5/7

Y1 - 2021/5/7

N2 - Building automation in the workplace is argued to open the door to a more energy-efficient and, thus, more sustainable future. The need for human interaction is replaced with automatic control and allowing algorithms to make autonomous decisions for the buildings’ energy systems, like heating, lighting and air conditioning. However, automation takes away the occupants’ agency leading to unexpected rebound effects, and may itself require energy-consuming elaborate algorithms, new sensors, data storage and computational infrastructure. I ask, is office building automation really a viable approach for the people and the planet? Or is the rhetoric of automation helping us turn a blind eye to the fact that we should invest our energy fundamentally differently? In this position paper I raise questions about the social and environmental sustainability of office building automation and the power of those who are made uncomfortable so we can all feel a little bit better about ourselves.

AB - Building automation in the workplace is argued to open the door to a more energy-efficient and, thus, more sustainable future. The need for human interaction is replaced with automatic control and allowing algorithms to make autonomous decisions for the buildings’ energy systems, like heating, lighting and air conditioning. However, automation takes away the occupants’ agency leading to unexpected rebound effects, and may itself require energy-consuming elaborate algorithms, new sensors, data storage and computational infrastructure. I ask, is office building automation really a viable approach for the people and the planet? Or is the rhetoric of automation helping us turn a blind eye to the fact that we should invest our energy fundamentally differently? In this position paper I raise questions about the social and environmental sustainability of office building automation and the power of those who are made uncomfortable so we can all feel a little bit better about ourselves.

M3 - Other

Y2 - 7 May 2021

ER -