Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Abierto pero injusto
View graph of relations

Abierto pero injusto: el papel de la justicia social en las publicaciones de acceso abierto

Research output: Exhibits, objects and web-based outputsBlogpeer-review

Translated title of the contributionOpen but Unfair: he role of social justice in Open Access publishing [Originally published in the LSE Impact blog in October/2020]
Publication date30/10/2020
PublisherSciELO – Scientific Electronic Library Online
<mark>Original language</mark>Spanish


Stage one of the Open Access (OA) movement promoted the democratization of scholarly knowledge, making work available so that anybody could read it. However, publication in highly ranked journals is becoming very costly, feeding the same vendor capitalists that OA was designed to sidestep. In this Q&A, Simon Batterbury argues that when prestige is valued over publication ethics, a paradoxical situation emerges where conversations about social justice take place in unjust journals. Academic freedom and integrity are at risk unless Open Access becomes not simply about the democratization of knowledge, but the ethics of its publication too.