Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Accuracy versus precision in boosted top taggin...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector. / The ATLAS collaboration.
In: Journal of Instrumentation, Vol. 19, No. 08, P08018, 27.08.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

The ATLAS collaboration 2024, 'Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector', Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 19, no. 08, P08018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018

APA

The ATLAS collaboration (2024). Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector. Journal of Instrumentation, 19(08), Article P08018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018

Vancouver

The ATLAS collaboration. Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector. Journal of Instrumentation. 2024 Aug 27;19(08):P08018. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018

Author

The ATLAS collaboration. / Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector. In: Journal of Instrumentation. 2024 ; Vol. 19, No. 08.

Bibtex

@article{50eca19a181a4c49b3c0f9e445cae12b,
title = "Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector",
abstract = "The identification of top quark decays where the top quark has a large momentum transverse to the beam axis, known as top tagging, is a crucial component in many measurements of Standard Model processes and searches for beyond the Standard Model physics at the Large Hadron Collider. Machine learning techniques have improved the performance of top tagging algorithms, but the size of the systematic uncertainties for all proposed algorithms has not been systematically studied. This paper presents the performance of several machine learning based top tagging algorithms on a dataset constructed from simulated proton-proton collision events measured with the ATLAS detector at {\^a}ˆ{\v s} s = 13 TeV. The systematic uncertainties associated with these algorithms are estimated through an approximate procedure that is not meant to be used in a physics analysis, but is appropriate for the level of precision required for this study. The most performant algorithms are found to have the largest uncertainties, motivating the development of methods to reduce these uncertainties without compromising performance. To enable such efforts in the wider scientific community, the datasets used in this paper are made publicly available.",
keywords = "Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors, Analysis and statistical methods",
author = "{The ATLAS collaboration} and Z.M.K. Alsolami and A.E. Barton and G. Borissov and E.V. Bouhova-Thacker and Ruby Ferguson and James Ferrando and H. Fox and Alina Hagan and R.C.W. Henderson and R.W.L. Jones and V. Kartvelishvili and P.A. Love and E.J. Marshall and L. Meng and D. Muenstermann and N. Ribaric and Elliot Sampson and M. Smizanska and A.M. Wharton",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Journal of Instrumentation",
issn = "1748-0221",
publisher = "Institute of Physics Publishing",
number = "08",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector

AU - The ATLAS collaboration

AU - Alsolami, Z.M.K.

AU - Barton, A.E.

AU - Borissov, G.

AU - Bouhova-Thacker, E.V.

AU - Ferguson, Ruby

AU - Ferrando, James

AU - Fox, H.

AU - Hagan, Alina

AU - Henderson, R.C.W.

AU - Jones, R.W.L.

AU - Kartvelishvili, V.

AU - Love, P.A.

AU - Marshall, E.J.

AU - Meng, L.

AU - Muenstermann, D.

AU - Ribaric, N.

AU - Sampson, Elliot

AU - Smizanska, M.

AU - Wharton, A.M.

PY - 2024/8/27

Y1 - 2024/8/27

N2 - The identification of top quark decays where the top quark has a large momentum transverse to the beam axis, known as top tagging, is a crucial component in many measurements of Standard Model processes and searches for beyond the Standard Model physics at the Large Hadron Collider. Machine learning techniques have improved the performance of top tagging algorithms, but the size of the systematic uncertainties for all proposed algorithms has not been systematically studied. This paper presents the performance of several machine learning based top tagging algorithms on a dataset constructed from simulated proton-proton collision events measured with the ATLAS detector at √ s = 13 TeV. The systematic uncertainties associated with these algorithms are estimated through an approximate procedure that is not meant to be used in a physics analysis, but is appropriate for the level of precision required for this study. The most performant algorithms are found to have the largest uncertainties, motivating the development of methods to reduce these uncertainties without compromising performance. To enable such efforts in the wider scientific community, the datasets used in this paper are made publicly available.

AB - The identification of top quark decays where the top quark has a large momentum transverse to the beam axis, known as top tagging, is a crucial component in many measurements of Standard Model processes and searches for beyond the Standard Model physics at the Large Hadron Collider. Machine learning techniques have improved the performance of top tagging algorithms, but the size of the systematic uncertainties for all proposed algorithms has not been systematically studied. This paper presents the performance of several machine learning based top tagging algorithms on a dataset constructed from simulated proton-proton collision events measured with the ATLAS detector at √ s = 13 TeV. The systematic uncertainties associated with these algorithms are estimated through an approximate procedure that is not meant to be used in a physics analysis, but is appropriate for the level of precision required for this study. The most performant algorithms are found to have the largest uncertainties, motivating the development of methods to reduce these uncertainties without compromising performance. To enable such efforts in the wider scientific community, the datasets used in this paper are made publicly available.

KW - Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors

KW - Analysis and statistical methods

U2 - 10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018

DO - 10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08018

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Instrumentation

JF - Journal of Instrumentation

SN - 1748-0221

IS - 08

M1 - P08018

ER -