Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets w...

Electronic data

  • 1509.00172v2

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics on 03/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

    Accepted author manuscript, 573 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods. / Sherlock, Christopher Gerrard; Golightly, Andrew; Henderson, Daniel.
In: Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 434-444.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Sherlock, CG, Golightly, A & Henderson, D 2017, 'Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods', Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

APA

Sherlock, C. G., Golightly, A., & Henderson, D. (2017). Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26(2), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

Vancouver

Sherlock CG, Golightly A, Henderson D. Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 2017 Jun 1;26(2):434-444. Epub 2017 Apr 24. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

Author

Sherlock, Christopher Gerrard ; Golightly, Andrew ; Henderson, Daniel. / Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods. In: Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 434-444.

Bibtex

@article{6f39262a664d46b2b262dd8230be78b6,
title = "Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods",
abstract = "When conducting Bayesian inference, delayed acceptance (DA) Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithms and DA pseudo-marginal MH algorithms can be applied when it is computationally expensive to calculate the true posterior or an unbiased estimate thereof, but a computationally cheap approximation is available. A first accept-reject stage is applied, with the cheap approximation substituted for the true posterior in the MH acceptance ratio. Only for those proposals which pass through the first stage is the computationally expensive true posterior (or unbiased estimate thereof) evaluated, with a second accept-reject stage ensuring that detailed balance is satisfied with respect to the intended true posterior. In some scenarios there is no obvious computationally cheap approximation. A weighted average of previous evaluations of the computationally expensive posterior provides a generic approximation to the posterior. If only the k-nearest neighbours have non-zero weights then evaluation of the approximate posterior can be made computationally cheap provided that the points at which the posterior has been evaluated are stored in a multi-dimensional binary tree, known as a KD-tree. The contents of the KD-tree are potentially updated after every computationally intensive evaluation. The resulting adaptive, delayed-acceptance [pseudo-marginal] Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is justified both theoretically and empirically. Guidance on tuning parameters is provided and the methodology is applied to a discretely observed Markov jump process characterising predator-prey interactions and an ODE system describing the dynamics of an autoregulatory gene network.",
keywords = "Delayed-acceptance, surrogate, adaptive MCMC, pseudo-marginal MCMC, KD-tree",
author = "Sherlock, {Christopher Gerrard} and Andrew Golightly and Daniel Henderson",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics on 03/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "434--444",
journal = "Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics",
issn = "1061-8600",
publisher = "American Statistical Association",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive, delayed-acceptance MCMC for targets with expensive likelihoods

AU - Sherlock, Christopher Gerrard

AU - Golightly, Andrew

AU - Henderson, Daniel

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics on 03/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - When conducting Bayesian inference, delayed acceptance (DA) Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithms and DA pseudo-marginal MH algorithms can be applied when it is computationally expensive to calculate the true posterior or an unbiased estimate thereof, but a computationally cheap approximation is available. A first accept-reject stage is applied, with the cheap approximation substituted for the true posterior in the MH acceptance ratio. Only for those proposals which pass through the first stage is the computationally expensive true posterior (or unbiased estimate thereof) evaluated, with a second accept-reject stage ensuring that detailed balance is satisfied with respect to the intended true posterior. In some scenarios there is no obvious computationally cheap approximation. A weighted average of previous evaluations of the computationally expensive posterior provides a generic approximation to the posterior. If only the k-nearest neighbours have non-zero weights then evaluation of the approximate posterior can be made computationally cheap provided that the points at which the posterior has been evaluated are stored in a multi-dimensional binary tree, known as a KD-tree. The contents of the KD-tree are potentially updated after every computationally intensive evaluation. The resulting adaptive, delayed-acceptance [pseudo-marginal] Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is justified both theoretically and empirically. Guidance on tuning parameters is provided and the methodology is applied to a discretely observed Markov jump process characterising predator-prey interactions and an ODE system describing the dynamics of an autoregulatory gene network.

AB - When conducting Bayesian inference, delayed acceptance (DA) Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithms and DA pseudo-marginal MH algorithms can be applied when it is computationally expensive to calculate the true posterior or an unbiased estimate thereof, but a computationally cheap approximation is available. A first accept-reject stage is applied, with the cheap approximation substituted for the true posterior in the MH acceptance ratio. Only for those proposals which pass through the first stage is the computationally expensive true posterior (or unbiased estimate thereof) evaluated, with a second accept-reject stage ensuring that detailed balance is satisfied with respect to the intended true posterior. In some scenarios there is no obvious computationally cheap approximation. A weighted average of previous evaluations of the computationally expensive posterior provides a generic approximation to the posterior. If only the k-nearest neighbours have non-zero weights then evaluation of the approximate posterior can be made computationally cheap provided that the points at which the posterior has been evaluated are stored in a multi-dimensional binary tree, known as a KD-tree. The contents of the KD-tree are potentially updated after every computationally intensive evaluation. The resulting adaptive, delayed-acceptance [pseudo-marginal] Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is justified both theoretically and empirically. Guidance on tuning parameters is provided and the methodology is applied to a discretely observed Markov jump process characterising predator-prey interactions and an ODE system describing the dynamics of an autoregulatory gene network.

KW - Delayed-acceptance

KW - surrogate

KW - adaptive MCMC

KW - pseudo-marginal MCMC

KW - KD-tree

U2 - 10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

DO - 10.1080/10618600.2016.1231064

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 434

EP - 444

JO - Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

JF - Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

SN - 1061-8600

IS - 2

ER -