Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Adults’ Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infa...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Adults’ Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Size and Mass Relationships in Collision Events

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Adults’ Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Size and Mass Relationships in Collision Events. / Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.; Hayes, Lawrence D.; Walker, Peter et al.
In: Appl. Sci., Vol. 12, No. 19, 9846, 30.09.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sanal-Hayes NEM, Hayes LD, Walker P, Mair JL, Bremner JG, Lavdas AA, (ed.). Adults’ Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Size and Mass Relationships in Collision Events. Appl. Sci. 2022 Sept 30;12(19):9846. doi: 10.3390/app12199846

Author

Bibtex

@article{911ecdabcfb64fc5ad368018e96ba955,
title = "Adults{\textquoteright} Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infants{\textquoteright} Perception of Size and Mass Relationships in Collision Events",
abstract = "Humans first start to perceive the relationship between object size and mass in simple collision events at about 5.5–6.5 months of age. They perceive this link in simple collision events by attending to the size of the moving object and anticipating a greater displacement after collision with a large object and a lesser displacement with a small object. The results this aforementioned experiment is based on infants{\textquoteright} responses to a large and small object propelling a stationary object to the same distance (long distance). It is unknown how infants would perceive the same events if a large and small object propelled a stationary object to size appropriate (congruent) and size inappropriate (incongruent) distances. This paper aims to investigate this with adults (experiment 1) and 6-to-7-month-old infants (experiment 2). The first experiment served to validate our computer-generated collision events, by asking adults (N = 24) to rate the likeness of collision events happening in real-life, based on object size. In the second experiment, we tested this phenomenon in infants (N = 16) using the looking time paradigm. Results from the first experiment revealed that our computer-generated collision events are in line with adults{\textquoteright} assumptions of size-appropriate and size-inappropriate distances that the cube is propelled to by the small and large ball. Adults rated congruent test events as more likely than incongruent test events when asked how real-life-based they were. Results from the second experiment revealed infants distinguished between the sizes by preferring to look at the large ball longer than the small ball. However, the infants did not differ in their looking times for congruent and incongruent test events for small or/and large balls. For that reason, we conclude infants can distinguish between the sizes of the balls but are unable to perceive the size and mass associations in collision events.",
keywords = "Article, looking time, collision events, violation of expectation, object size, infants, baby physics",
author = "Sanal-Hayes, {Nilihan E. M.} and Hayes, {Lawrence D.} and Peter Walker and Mair, {Jacqueline L.} and Bremner, {J. Gavin} and Lavdas, {Alexandros A.}",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.3390/app12199846",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Appl. Sci.",
issn = "2076-3417",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adults’ Understanding and 6-To-7-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Size and Mass Relationships in Collision Events

AU - Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.

AU - Hayes, Lawrence D.

AU - Walker, Peter

AU - Mair, Jacqueline L.

AU - Bremner, J. Gavin

A2 - Lavdas, Alexandros A.

PY - 2022/9/30

Y1 - 2022/9/30

N2 - Humans first start to perceive the relationship between object size and mass in simple collision events at about 5.5–6.5 months of age. They perceive this link in simple collision events by attending to the size of the moving object and anticipating a greater displacement after collision with a large object and a lesser displacement with a small object. The results this aforementioned experiment is based on infants’ responses to a large and small object propelling a stationary object to the same distance (long distance). It is unknown how infants would perceive the same events if a large and small object propelled a stationary object to size appropriate (congruent) and size inappropriate (incongruent) distances. This paper aims to investigate this with adults (experiment 1) and 6-to-7-month-old infants (experiment 2). The first experiment served to validate our computer-generated collision events, by asking adults (N = 24) to rate the likeness of collision events happening in real-life, based on object size. In the second experiment, we tested this phenomenon in infants (N = 16) using the looking time paradigm. Results from the first experiment revealed that our computer-generated collision events are in line with adults’ assumptions of size-appropriate and size-inappropriate distances that the cube is propelled to by the small and large ball. Adults rated congruent test events as more likely than incongruent test events when asked how real-life-based they were. Results from the second experiment revealed infants distinguished between the sizes by preferring to look at the large ball longer than the small ball. However, the infants did not differ in their looking times for congruent and incongruent test events for small or/and large balls. For that reason, we conclude infants can distinguish between the sizes of the balls but are unable to perceive the size and mass associations in collision events.

AB - Humans first start to perceive the relationship between object size and mass in simple collision events at about 5.5–6.5 months of age. They perceive this link in simple collision events by attending to the size of the moving object and anticipating a greater displacement after collision with a large object and a lesser displacement with a small object. The results this aforementioned experiment is based on infants’ responses to a large and small object propelling a stationary object to the same distance (long distance). It is unknown how infants would perceive the same events if a large and small object propelled a stationary object to size appropriate (congruent) and size inappropriate (incongruent) distances. This paper aims to investigate this with adults (experiment 1) and 6-to-7-month-old infants (experiment 2). The first experiment served to validate our computer-generated collision events, by asking adults (N = 24) to rate the likeness of collision events happening in real-life, based on object size. In the second experiment, we tested this phenomenon in infants (N = 16) using the looking time paradigm. Results from the first experiment revealed that our computer-generated collision events are in line with adults’ assumptions of size-appropriate and size-inappropriate distances that the cube is propelled to by the small and large ball. Adults rated congruent test events as more likely than incongruent test events when asked how real-life-based they were. Results from the second experiment revealed infants distinguished between the sizes by preferring to look at the large ball longer than the small ball. However, the infants did not differ in their looking times for congruent and incongruent test events for small or/and large balls. For that reason, we conclude infants can distinguish between the sizes of the balls but are unable to perceive the size and mass associations in collision events.

KW - Article

KW - looking time

KW - collision events

KW - violation of expectation

KW - object size

KW - infants

KW - baby physics

U2 - 10.3390/app12199846

DO - 10.3390/app12199846

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

JO - Appl. Sci.

JF - Appl. Sci.

SN - 2076-3417

IS - 19

M1 - 9846

ER -