Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review. / Mategula, Donnie; Gichuki, Judy; Barnes, Karen I. et al.
In: PLOS Global Public Health, Vol. 5, No. 5, e0003751, 14.05.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mategula, D, Gichuki, J, Barnes, KI, Giorgi, E, Terlouw, DJ & Robinson, J (ed.) 2025, 'Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review', PLOS Global Public Health, vol. 5, no. 5, e0003751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751

APA

Mategula, D., Gichuki, J., Barnes, K. I., Giorgi, E., Terlouw, D. J., & Robinson, J. (Ed.) (2025). Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review. PLOS Global Public Health, 5(5), Article e0003751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751

Vancouver

Mategula D, Gichuki J, Barnes KI, Giorgi E, Terlouw DJ, Robinson J, (ed.). Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review. PLOS Global Public Health. 2025 May 14;5(5):e0003751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751

Author

Mategula, Donnie ; Gichuki, Judy ; Barnes, Karen I. et al. / Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria : Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review. In: PLOS Global Public Health. 2025 ; Vol. 5, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{1effb6060d7041eba70d520ea4f4cd3c,
title = "Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review",
abstract = "Malaria Early Warning Systems (EWS) are predictive tools that often use climatic and other environmental variables to forecast malaria risk and trigger timely interventions. Despite their potential benefits, the development and implementation of malaria EWS face significant challenges and limitations. We reviewed the current evidence on malaria EWS, including their settings, methods, performance, actions, and evaluation. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using keywords related to EWS and malaria in various databases and registers. We included primary research and programmatic reports on developing and implementing Malaria EWS. We extracted and synthesized data on the characteristics, outcomes, and experiences of Malaria EWS. We screened 6,233 records and identified 30 studies from 16 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in their transmission settings, from pre-elimination to high burden, and their purposes, ranging from outbreak detection to resource allocation. The studies employed various statistical and machine-learning models to forecast malaria cases, often incorporating environmental covariates such as rainfall and temperature. The most common mode used is the time series model. The performance of the models was assessed using measures such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and adjusted R-squared (R 2). The studies reported actions and responses triggered by EWS predictions, such as vector control, case management, and health education. The lack of standardized criteria and methodologies limited the evaluation of EWS impact. Our review highlights the strengths and limitations of malaria early warning systems, emphasizing the need for methodological refinement, standardization of evaluation metrics, and real-time integration into public health workflows. While significant progress has been made, challenges remain in automating forecasting tools, ensuring scalability, and aligning predictions with actionable public health responses. Future efforts should enhance model precision, usability, and adaptability to improve malaria prevention and control strategies in endemic regions.",
author = "Donnie Mategula and Judy Gichuki and Barnes, {Karen I.} and Emanuele Giorgi and Terlouw, {Dianne Janette} and Julia Robinson",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "PLOS Global Public Health",
issn = "2767-3375",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria

T2 - Progress, challenges, and future directions - A scoping review

AU - Mategula, Donnie

AU - Gichuki, Judy

AU - Barnes, Karen I.

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

AU - Terlouw, Dianne Janette

A2 - Robinson, Julia

PY - 2025/5/14

Y1 - 2025/5/14

N2 - Malaria Early Warning Systems (EWS) are predictive tools that often use climatic and other environmental variables to forecast malaria risk and trigger timely interventions. Despite their potential benefits, the development and implementation of malaria EWS face significant challenges and limitations. We reviewed the current evidence on malaria EWS, including their settings, methods, performance, actions, and evaluation. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using keywords related to EWS and malaria in various databases and registers. We included primary research and programmatic reports on developing and implementing Malaria EWS. We extracted and synthesized data on the characteristics, outcomes, and experiences of Malaria EWS. We screened 6,233 records and identified 30 studies from 16 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in their transmission settings, from pre-elimination to high burden, and their purposes, ranging from outbreak detection to resource allocation. The studies employed various statistical and machine-learning models to forecast malaria cases, often incorporating environmental covariates such as rainfall and temperature. The most common mode used is the time series model. The performance of the models was assessed using measures such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and adjusted R-squared (R 2). The studies reported actions and responses triggered by EWS predictions, such as vector control, case management, and health education. The lack of standardized criteria and methodologies limited the evaluation of EWS impact. Our review highlights the strengths and limitations of malaria early warning systems, emphasizing the need for methodological refinement, standardization of evaluation metrics, and real-time integration into public health workflows. While significant progress has been made, challenges remain in automating forecasting tools, ensuring scalability, and aligning predictions with actionable public health responses. Future efforts should enhance model precision, usability, and adaptability to improve malaria prevention and control strategies in endemic regions.

AB - Malaria Early Warning Systems (EWS) are predictive tools that often use climatic and other environmental variables to forecast malaria risk and trigger timely interventions. Despite their potential benefits, the development and implementation of malaria EWS face significant challenges and limitations. We reviewed the current evidence on malaria EWS, including their settings, methods, performance, actions, and evaluation. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using keywords related to EWS and malaria in various databases and registers. We included primary research and programmatic reports on developing and implementing Malaria EWS. We extracted and synthesized data on the characteristics, outcomes, and experiences of Malaria EWS. We screened 6,233 records and identified 30 studies from 16 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in their transmission settings, from pre-elimination to high burden, and their purposes, ranging from outbreak detection to resource allocation. The studies employed various statistical and machine-learning models to forecast malaria cases, often incorporating environmental covariates such as rainfall and temperature. The most common mode used is the time series model. The performance of the models was assessed using measures such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and adjusted R-squared (R 2). The studies reported actions and responses triggered by EWS predictions, such as vector control, case management, and health education. The lack of standardized criteria and methodologies limited the evaluation of EWS impact. Our review highlights the strengths and limitations of malaria early warning systems, emphasizing the need for methodological refinement, standardization of evaluation metrics, and real-time integration into public health workflows. While significant progress has been made, challenges remain in automating forecasting tools, ensuring scalability, and aligning predictions with actionable public health responses. Future efforts should enhance model precision, usability, and adaptability to improve malaria prevention and control strategies in endemic regions.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751

DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003751

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - PLOS Global Public Health

JF - PLOS Global Public Health

SN - 2767-3375

IS - 5

M1 - e0003751

ER -