Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > AGN host galaxies at z ~ 0.4-1.3

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

AGN host galaxies at z ~ 0.4-1.3: bulge-dominated and lacking merger-AGN connection

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • N. A. Grogin
  • C. J. Conselice
  • E. Chatzichristou
  • D. M. Alexander
  • F. E. Bauer
  • A. E. Hornschemeier
  • S. Jogee
  • A. M. Koekemoer
  • V. G. Laidler
  • M. Livio
  • R. A. Lucas
  • M. Paolillo
  • S. Ravindranath
  • E. J. Schreier
  • B. D. Simmons
  • C. M. Urry
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>10/07/2005
<mark>Journal</mark>The Astrophysical Journal
Issue number2
Volume627
Number of pages4
Pages (from-to)L97-L100
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

We investigate morphological structure parameters and local environments of distant moderate-luminosity active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies in the overlap between the HST/ACS observations of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and the two Chandra Deep Fields. We compute near-neighbor counts and BViz asymmetry (A) and concentration (C) indices for ≈35,500 GOODS/ACS galaxies complete to , including z850 ≈ 26.6 the resolved hosts of 322 X-ray–selected AGNs. Distributions of (1) asymmetry for 130 AGN hosts z z 850 850 ! 23 and (2) near-neighbor counts for 173 AGN hosts are both consistent with non-AGN control samples. z850 ! 24 This implies no close connection between recent galaxy mergers and moderate-luminosity AGN activity out to appreciable look-back times ( ), approaching the epoch of peak AGN activity in the universe. The distri- z 1.3 bution of z850 C for the AGN hosts is offset by compared to the non-AGN, a 6.4 DC ≈ 0.5 j discrepancy much larger than can be explained by the possible influence of unresolved emission from the AGN or a circumnuclear starburst. The local universe association between AGN and bulge-dominated galaxies thus persists to substantial look-back time. We discuss implications in the context of the low-redshift supermassive central black hole mass correlation with host galaxy properties, including concentration.