Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with ai...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • ICRAT_2024

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.04 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores. / Jiang, Yuhan; De Giovanni, Luigi ; Lancia, Carlo et al.
2024. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Singapore, Singapore.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Jiang, Y, De Giovanni, L, Lancia, C & Lulli, G 2024, 'An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores', Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Singapore, Singapore, 1/07/24 - 4/07/24.

APA

Jiang, Y., De Giovanni, L., Lancia, C., & Lulli, G. (in press). An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Singapore, Singapore.

Vancouver

Jiang Y, De Giovanni L, Lancia C, Lulli G. An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores. 2024. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Singapore, Singapore.

Author

Jiang, Yuhan ; De Giovanni, Luigi ; Lancia, Carlo et al. / An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Singapore, Singapore.8 p.

Bibtex

@conference{1694d89f1fa6466288ad1bc1858e0a83,
title = "An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users{\textquoteright} preference scores",
abstract = "In this paper, we compare two trajectory-centered Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) architectures that assign a trajectory and a departure time slot to each flight. The main feature of these architectures is the use of trajectories that are feasible from the operational point of view and are aligned as much as possible with airspace users{\textquoteright} preferences. The first architecture is inspired by the first-come-first-served principle and can be seen as a proxy of the approach currently used in practice. The second one—herein named “preference-aware ATFM architecture”—considers alternative trajectory options and explicitly takes the related preference scores into account: its main objective is to provide better trade-offs between user-preferred trajectories and system efficiency. The analysis herein carried out highlights the benefits of the latter architecture in terms of both system efficiency and satisfaction of airspace users{\textquoteright} preferences, thus paving the way to its potential use as a tool for the ATFM collaborative decision-making process.",
keywords = "ATFM, preference scores, trade-off analysis",
author = "Yuhan Jiang and {De Giovanni}, Luigi and Carlo Lancia and Guglielmo Lulli",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "6",
language = "English",
note = "11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, ICRAT ; Conference date: 01-07-2024 Through 04-07-2024",
url = "https://www.icrat.org/",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - An analysis of trajectory centered ATFM with airspace users’ preference scores

AU - Jiang, Yuhan

AU - De Giovanni, Luigi

AU - Lancia, Carlo

AU - Lulli, Guglielmo

N1 - Conference code: 11

PY - 2024/4/6

Y1 - 2024/4/6

N2 - In this paper, we compare two trajectory-centered Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) architectures that assign a trajectory and a departure time slot to each flight. The main feature of these architectures is the use of trajectories that are feasible from the operational point of view and are aligned as much as possible with airspace users’ preferences. The first architecture is inspired by the first-come-first-served principle and can be seen as a proxy of the approach currently used in practice. The second one—herein named “preference-aware ATFM architecture”—considers alternative trajectory options and explicitly takes the related preference scores into account: its main objective is to provide better trade-offs between user-preferred trajectories and system efficiency. The analysis herein carried out highlights the benefits of the latter architecture in terms of both system efficiency and satisfaction of airspace users’ preferences, thus paving the way to its potential use as a tool for the ATFM collaborative decision-making process.

AB - In this paper, we compare two trajectory-centered Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) architectures that assign a trajectory and a departure time slot to each flight. The main feature of these architectures is the use of trajectories that are feasible from the operational point of view and are aligned as much as possible with airspace users’ preferences. The first architecture is inspired by the first-come-first-served principle and can be seen as a proxy of the approach currently used in practice. The second one—herein named “preference-aware ATFM architecture”—considers alternative trajectory options and explicitly takes the related preference scores into account: its main objective is to provide better trade-offs between user-preferred trajectories and system efficiency. The analysis herein carried out highlights the benefits of the latter architecture in terms of both system efficiency and satisfaction of airspace users’ preferences, thus paving the way to its potential use as a tool for the ATFM collaborative decision-making process.

KW - ATFM

KW - preference scores

KW - trade-off analysis

M3 - Conference paper

T2 - 11th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation

Y2 - 1 July 2024 through 4 July 2024

ER -