TY - JOUR

T1 - An exemplar model should be able to explain all syntactic priming phenomena: A commentary on Ambridge (2020)

AU - Messenger, Katherine

AU - Hardy, Sophie M.

AU - Coumel, Marion

PY - 2020/2/10

Y1 - 2020/2/10

N2 - The authors argue that Ambridge’s radical exemplar account of language cannot clearly explain all syntactic priming evidence, such as inverse preference effects (greater priming for less frequent structures), and the contrast between short-lived lexical boost and long-lived abstract priming. Moreover, without recourse to a level of abstract syntactic structure, Ambridge’s account cannot explain abstract priming in amnesia patients or cross-linguistic priming. Instead, the authors argue that abstract representations remain the more parsimonious account for the wide variety of syntactic priming phenomena.

AB - The authors argue that Ambridge’s radical exemplar account of language cannot clearly explain all syntactic priming evidence, such as inverse preference effects (greater priming for less frequent structures), and the contrast between short-lived lexical boost and long-lived abstract priming. Moreover, without recourse to a level of abstract syntactic structure, Ambridge’s account cannot explain abstract priming in amnesia patients or cross-linguistic priming. Instead, the authors argue that abstract representations remain the more parsimonious account for the wide variety of syntactic priming phenomena.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723720904479

U2 - 10.1177/0142723720904479

DO - 10.1177/0142723720904479

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

JO - First Language

JF - First Language

SN - 0142-7237

IS - 5-6

ER -