Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Applying a modified systematic review and integ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †. / Bui, Thuy T.; Aasa, Jenny; Abass, Khaled et al.
In: Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, Vol. 26, No. 2, 21.02.2024, p. 380-399.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bui, TT, Aasa, J, Abass, K, Ågerstrand, M, Beronius, A, Castro, M, Escrivá, L, Galizia, A, Gliga, A, Karlsson, O, Whaley, P, Yost, E & Rudén, C 2024, 'Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †', Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 380-399. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3em00353a

APA

Bui, T. T., Aasa, J., Abass, K., Ågerstrand, M., Beronius, A., Castro, M., Escrivá, L., Galizia, A., Gliga, A., Karlsson, O., Whaley, P., Yost, E., & Rudén, C. (2024). Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 26(2), 380-399. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3em00353a

Vancouver

Bui TT, Aasa J, Abass K, Ågerstrand M, Beronius A, Castro M et al. Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts. 2024 Feb 21;26(2):380-399. Epub 2023 Dec 26. doi: 10.1039/d3em00353a

Author

Bui, Thuy T. ; Aasa, Jenny ; Abass, Khaled et al. / Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †. In: Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts. 2024 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 380-399.

Bibtex

@article{3f59b253afab4347ba6c6903ce5dc894,
title = "Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †",
abstract = "This work presents a case study in applying a systematic review framework (SYRINA) to the identification of chemicals as endocrine disruptors. The suitability and performance of the framework is tested with regard to the widely accepted World Health Organization definition of an endocrine disruptor (ED). The endocrine disrupting potential of triphenyl phosphate (TPP), a well-studied flame retardant reported to exhibit various endocrine related effects was assessed. We followed the 7 steps of the SYRINA framework, articulating the research objective via Populations, Exposures, Comparators, Outcomes (PECO) statements, performed literature search and screening, conducted study evaluation, performed data extraction and summarized and integrated the evidence. Overall, 66 studies, consisting of in vivo, in vitro and epidemiological data, were included. We concluded that triphenyl phosphate could be identified as an ED based on metabolic disruption and reproductive function. We found that the tools used in this case study and the optimizations performed on the framework were suitable to assess properties of EDs. A number of challenges and areas for methodological development in systematic appraisal of evidence relating to endocrine disrupting potential were identified; significant time and effort were needed for the analysis of in vitro mechanistic data in this case study, thus increasing the workload and time needed to perform the systematic review process. Further research and development of this framework with regards to grey literature (non-peer-reviewed literature) search, harmonization of study evaluation methods, more consistent evidence integration approaches and a pre-defined method to assess links between adverse effect and endocrine activity are recommended. It would also be advantageous to conduct more case studies for a chemical with less data than TPP.",
author = "Bui, {Thuy T.} and Jenny Aasa and Khaled Abass and Marlene {\AA}gerstrand and Anna Beronius and Mafalda Castro and Laura Escriv{\'a} and Audrey Galizia and Anda Gliga and Oskar Karlsson and Paul Whaley and Erin Yost and Christina Rud{\'e}n",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1039/d3em00353a",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "380--399",
journal = "Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts",
issn = "2050-7887",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying a modified systematic review and integrated assessment framework (SYRINA) – a case study on triphenyl phosphate †

AU - Bui, Thuy T.

AU - Aasa, Jenny

AU - Abass, Khaled

AU - Ågerstrand, Marlene

AU - Beronius, Anna

AU - Castro, Mafalda

AU - Escrivá, Laura

AU - Galizia, Audrey

AU - Gliga, Anda

AU - Karlsson, Oskar

AU - Whaley, Paul

AU - Yost, Erin

AU - Rudén, Christina

PY - 2024/2/21

Y1 - 2024/2/21

N2 - This work presents a case study in applying a systematic review framework (SYRINA) to the identification of chemicals as endocrine disruptors. The suitability and performance of the framework is tested with regard to the widely accepted World Health Organization definition of an endocrine disruptor (ED). The endocrine disrupting potential of triphenyl phosphate (TPP), a well-studied flame retardant reported to exhibit various endocrine related effects was assessed. We followed the 7 steps of the SYRINA framework, articulating the research objective via Populations, Exposures, Comparators, Outcomes (PECO) statements, performed literature search and screening, conducted study evaluation, performed data extraction and summarized and integrated the evidence. Overall, 66 studies, consisting of in vivo, in vitro and epidemiological data, were included. We concluded that triphenyl phosphate could be identified as an ED based on metabolic disruption and reproductive function. We found that the tools used in this case study and the optimizations performed on the framework were suitable to assess properties of EDs. A number of challenges and areas for methodological development in systematic appraisal of evidence relating to endocrine disrupting potential were identified; significant time and effort were needed for the analysis of in vitro mechanistic data in this case study, thus increasing the workload and time needed to perform the systematic review process. Further research and development of this framework with regards to grey literature (non-peer-reviewed literature) search, harmonization of study evaluation methods, more consistent evidence integration approaches and a pre-defined method to assess links between adverse effect and endocrine activity are recommended. It would also be advantageous to conduct more case studies for a chemical with less data than TPP.

AB - This work presents a case study in applying a systematic review framework (SYRINA) to the identification of chemicals as endocrine disruptors. The suitability and performance of the framework is tested with regard to the widely accepted World Health Organization definition of an endocrine disruptor (ED). The endocrine disrupting potential of triphenyl phosphate (TPP), a well-studied flame retardant reported to exhibit various endocrine related effects was assessed. We followed the 7 steps of the SYRINA framework, articulating the research objective via Populations, Exposures, Comparators, Outcomes (PECO) statements, performed literature search and screening, conducted study evaluation, performed data extraction and summarized and integrated the evidence. Overall, 66 studies, consisting of in vivo, in vitro and epidemiological data, were included. We concluded that triphenyl phosphate could be identified as an ED based on metabolic disruption and reproductive function. We found that the tools used in this case study and the optimizations performed on the framework were suitable to assess properties of EDs. A number of challenges and areas for methodological development in systematic appraisal of evidence relating to endocrine disrupting potential were identified; significant time and effort were needed for the analysis of in vitro mechanistic data in this case study, thus increasing the workload and time needed to perform the systematic review process. Further research and development of this framework with regards to grey literature (non-peer-reviewed literature) search, harmonization of study evaluation methods, more consistent evidence integration approaches and a pre-defined method to assess links between adverse effect and endocrine activity are recommended. It would also be advantageous to conduct more case studies for a chemical with less data than TPP.

U2 - 10.1039/d3em00353a

DO - 10.1039/d3em00353a

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38205707

VL - 26

SP - 380

EP - 399

JO - Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts

JF - Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts

SN - 2050-7887

IS - 2

ER -