Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems?: A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems? A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system. / Martin-Ortega, Julia; Rothwell, Shane A.; Anderson, Aine et al.
In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 131, 31.05.2022, p. 177-187.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Martin-Ortega, J, Rothwell, SA, Anderson, A, Okumah, M, Lyon, C, Sherry, E, Johnston, C, Withers, PJA & Doody, DG 2022, 'Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems? A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system', Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 131, pp. 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.011

APA

Vancouver

Martin-Ortega J, Rothwell SA, Anderson A, Okumah M, Lyon C, Sherry E et al. Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems? A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system. Environmental Science and Policy. 2022 May 31;131:177-187. Epub 2022 Feb 12. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.011

Author

Bibtex

@article{27a33db05958453e9208d61b5eb0449b,
title = "Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems?: A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system",
abstract = "Food systems worldwide are vulnerable to Phosphorus (P) supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Current P use is also highly inefficient, generating large surpluses and pollution. Global food security and aquatic ecosystems are in jeopardy if transformative action is not taken. This paper pivots from earlier (predominantly conceptual) work to develop and analyse a P transdisciplinary scenario process, assessing stakeholders potential for transformative thinking in P use in the food system. Northern Ireland, a highly livestock-intensive system, was used as case study for illustrating such process. The stakeholder engagement takes a normative stance in that it sets the explicit premise that the food system needs to be transformed and asks stakeholders to engage in a dialogue on how that transformation can be achieved. A Substance Flow Analysis of P flows and stocks was employed to construct visions for alternative futures and stimulate stakeholder discussions on system responses. These were analysed for their transformative potential using a triple-loop social learning framework. For the most part, stakeholder responses remained transitional or incremental, rather than being fundamentally transformative. The process did unveil some deeper levers that could be acted upon to move the system further along the spectrum of transformational change (e.g. changes in food markets, creation of new P markets, destocking, new types of land production and radical land use changes), providing clues of what an aspirational system could look like. Replicated and adapted elsewhere, this process can serve as diagnostics of current stakeholders thinking and potential, as well as for the identification of those deeper levers, opening up avenues to work upon for global scale transformation.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Northern Ireland, Participation, Scenario analysis, Social learning, Substance Flow Analysis, Transformations",
author = "Julia Martin-Ortega and Rothwell, {Shane A.} and Aine Anderson and Murat Okumah and Christopher Lyon and Erin Sherry and Christopher Johnston and Withers, {Paul J.A.} and Doody, {Donnacha G.}",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.011",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "177--187",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems?

T2 - A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system

AU - Martin-Ortega, Julia

AU - Rothwell, Shane A.

AU - Anderson, Aine

AU - Okumah, Murat

AU - Lyon, Christopher

AU - Sherry, Erin

AU - Johnston, Christopher

AU - Withers, Paul J.A.

AU - Doody, Donnacha G.

PY - 2022/5/31

Y1 - 2022/5/31

N2 - Food systems worldwide are vulnerable to Phosphorus (P) supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Current P use is also highly inefficient, generating large surpluses and pollution. Global food security and aquatic ecosystems are in jeopardy if transformative action is not taken. This paper pivots from earlier (predominantly conceptual) work to develop and analyse a P transdisciplinary scenario process, assessing stakeholders potential for transformative thinking in P use in the food system. Northern Ireland, a highly livestock-intensive system, was used as case study for illustrating such process. The stakeholder engagement takes a normative stance in that it sets the explicit premise that the food system needs to be transformed and asks stakeholders to engage in a dialogue on how that transformation can be achieved. A Substance Flow Analysis of P flows and stocks was employed to construct visions for alternative futures and stimulate stakeholder discussions on system responses. These were analysed for their transformative potential using a triple-loop social learning framework. For the most part, stakeholder responses remained transitional or incremental, rather than being fundamentally transformative. The process did unveil some deeper levers that could be acted upon to move the system further along the spectrum of transformational change (e.g. changes in food markets, creation of new P markets, destocking, new types of land production and radical land use changes), providing clues of what an aspirational system could look like. Replicated and adapted elsewhere, this process can serve as diagnostics of current stakeholders thinking and potential, as well as for the identification of those deeper levers, opening up avenues to work upon for global scale transformation.

AB - Food systems worldwide are vulnerable to Phosphorus (P) supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Current P use is also highly inefficient, generating large surpluses and pollution. Global food security and aquatic ecosystems are in jeopardy if transformative action is not taken. This paper pivots from earlier (predominantly conceptual) work to develop and analyse a P transdisciplinary scenario process, assessing stakeholders potential for transformative thinking in P use in the food system. Northern Ireland, a highly livestock-intensive system, was used as case study for illustrating such process. The stakeholder engagement takes a normative stance in that it sets the explicit premise that the food system needs to be transformed and asks stakeholders to engage in a dialogue on how that transformation can be achieved. A Substance Flow Analysis of P flows and stocks was employed to construct visions for alternative futures and stimulate stakeholder discussions on system responses. These were analysed for their transformative potential using a triple-loop social learning framework. For the most part, stakeholder responses remained transitional or incremental, rather than being fundamentally transformative. The process did unveil some deeper levers that could be acted upon to move the system further along the spectrum of transformational change (e.g. changes in food markets, creation of new P markets, destocking, new types of land production and radical land use changes), providing clues of what an aspirational system could look like. Replicated and adapted elsewhere, this process can serve as diagnostics of current stakeholders thinking and potential, as well as for the identification of those deeper levers, opening up avenues to work upon for global scale transformation.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - Participation

KW - Scenario analysis

KW - Social learning

KW - Substance Flow Analysis

KW - Transformations

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 131

SP - 177

EP - 187

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -